FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 387
Citation: Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 387 Parties: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM v MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE OF BPS RECOVERY, CRAIG PRYOR OF WARREN MCKEON DICKESON SOLICITORS PTY LTD and JACKSON LALIC SOLICITORS File number: NSD 547 of 2013 Judge: JACOBSON J Date of judgment: 17 April 2013 Cases cited: Sopikiotis, in the matter of Sopikiotis (Bankrupt) v Vince (Trustee) [2013] FCAFC 24 Date of hearing: 17 April 2013 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 8 Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms Taylor as litigation guardian Solicitor for the Respondents: Ms Nash
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 547 of 2013
BETWEEN: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM
ApplicantAND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE OF BPS RECOVERY
First RespondentCRAIG PRYOR OF WARREN MCKEON DICKESON SOLICITORS PTY LTD
Second RespondentJACKSON LALIC SOLICITORS
Third Respondent
JUDGE:
JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
17 APRIL 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for filing and serving of a Notice of Appeal by the appellant against the decision of Federal Magistrate Driver be extended to 7 May 2013.
2.As a condition of the extension of time, the parties are referred to mediation before a Registrar of the Federal Court no later than 1 May 2013. No step is to be taken in the appeal (including the filing of any Notice of Appeal), pending the outcome of the mediation.
3.The grounds of the appeal are to be limited to the question of denial of procedural fairness in accordance with the reasons for judgment handed down on 17 April 2013.
4.Pursuant to Federal Court Rule 9.63, Ms Rachel Taylor be appointed as litigation guardian for Mr Gary Allan Maytom, and that the requirements of the rules relating to the filing of an affidavit by Ms Taylor are dispensed with.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 547 of 2013
BETWEEN: GARY ALLAN MAYTOM
ApplicantAND: MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE OF BPS RECOVERY
First RespondentCRAIG PRYOR OF WARREN MCKEON DICKESON SOLICITORS PTY LTD
Second RespondentJACKSON LALIC SOLICITORS
Third Respondent
JUDGE:
JACOBSON J
DATE:
17 APRIL 2013
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for leave to extend time under rule 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules to file a notice of appeal against orders made by Driver FM on 4 March 2013. Time to lodge the notice of appeal expired on 26 March 2013. The present application was filed only two days later, on 28 March. Accordingly, the delay is very short and I take that matter into account in coming to the conclusion that I ought to grant the extension. However, one of the matters which informs the exercise of the jurisdiction to grant an extension of time is the prospects of success on an appeal. The applicant, Mr Maytom, has…
Continue reading Maytom v Prentice
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Maytom v Prentice [2013] FCA 387
- Case
- [2013] FCA 387
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court granted the appellant an extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal, setting the new deadline at 7 May 2013. This extension was contingent upon the parties engaging in mediation before a Registrar of the Federal Court by 1 May 2013. The mediation was to focus on the denial of procedural fairness as outlined in the reasons for judgment delivered on 17 April 2013. Additionally, the court ruled that the grounds of the appeal should be limited to this specific issue. Furthermore, the court appointed Ms Rachel Taylor as a litigation guardian for Mr Maytom, with the requirement of filing an affidavit by Ms Taylor being waived under Federal Court Rule 9.63.
The orders reflect the court's approach to managing the appeal process, ensuring procedural fairness and expediting resolution through mediation. The decision highlights the court's commitment to addressing the appellant's concerns while maintaining procedural integrity. The extension of time and the referral to mediation demonstrate the court's intent to facilitate a fair and effective appeal process. The final orders were entered pursuant to Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011, ensuring compliance with the procedural framework governing the court's decisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time for filing and serving of a Notice of Appeal by the appellant against the decision of Federal Magistrate Driver be extended to 7 May 2013.
2. As a condition of the extension of time, the parties are referred to mediation before a Registrar of the Federal Court no later than 1 May 2013. No step is to be taken in the appeal (including the filing of any Notice of Appeal), pending the outcome of the mediation.
3. The grounds of the appeal are to be limited to the question of denial of procedural fairness in accordance with the reasons for judgment handed down on 17 April 2013.
4. Pursuant to Federal Court Rule 9.63, Ms Rachel Taylor be appointed as litigation guardian for Mr Gary Allan Maytom, and that the requirements of the rules relating to the filing of an affidavit by Ms Taylor are dispensed with.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.