MATHEWS
V
COOPER & ORS
[2023] HCASL 80
B11/2023
The applicant seeks a substantial extension of time in which to apply for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Gotterson and Morrison JJA and Bond J). The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from orders made against the applicant under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2005 (Qld). The application raises no question of general principle and has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The extension of time is refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J. Gageler J.M. Jagot 18 May 2023
Continue reading Mathews v Cooper & Ors
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Mathews v Cooper & Ors [2023] HCASL 80
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 80
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the criteria for granting special leave to appeal, focusing on the need for the application to raise significant legal questions of general principle or to have sufficient prospects of success. In this case, the application did not meet these criteria. The court found that the case did not present any novel or significant legal issues and that the applicant's prospects of success in appealing the Court of Appeal's decision were low. As such, the court concluded that there was no merit in granting the requested extension of time.
As a result of the court's reasoning, the application for an extension of time was dismissed. The court further directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application, in accordance with rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). This decision underscores the stringent requirements for extensions of time in special leave applications to the High Court, particularly when the application does not involve substantial legal issues or have a reasonable chance of success.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.