Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matautia Developments Pty Ltd v Di Liristi [2021] NSWCATCD 77 Hearing dates: 29 November 2021 Date of orders: 21 December 2021 Decision date: 21 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Rosser, Principal Member Decision: 1. Leave for legal representation is granted.
2. The residential tenancy agreement between the parties is terminated immediately and the respondent is to give vacant possession of the residential premises to the applicant on 3 January 2022.
Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – Termination and possession - Transfer from Supreme Court – Res judicata
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)
Residential Tenancies Regulation 2010 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Athens v Randwick City Council [2005] NSWCA 317; 64 NSWLR 58
Blair v Curran [1939] HCA 23; 62 CLR 464
Di Liristi v Matautia Developments Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 166
Di Liristi v Matautia Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 862
Di Liristi v Matautia Developments Pty Ltd (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 760
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matautia Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Antonio Di Liristi (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
A Avery-Williams (Applicant)
Centurion Lawyers (Applicant)
Respondent (Self-represented)
File Number(s): RT 21/29690 Publication restriction: Nil
Reasons for decision
Introduction
-
These reasons for decision concern proceedings that were transferred to the Tribunal by the Supreme Court of New South Wales on 23 June 2021: Di Liristi v Matautia Developments Pty Ltd (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 760 Relevantly, in those proceedings Cavanagh J made the following order:
3) Order that the proceedings be transferred to the Tribunal for the making of an order for termination of the residential tenancy agreement dated 7 June 2019 and possession of the premises at … Austral in accordance with the declaration of the Court made on 11 June 2021.
-
Upon transfer of the proceedings, they were allocated the file number RT 21/29690.
-
In the transferred proceedings, the applicant sought the following orders:
The residential tenancy agreement between the parties is terminated immediately.
Possession of the premises to be given to the landlord immediately.
The order for possession is suspended for 7 days from the date of the Tribunal’s orders.
-
The applicant did not seek an order for payment of an occupation fee.
-
The respondent opposed the orders sought on the basis that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to deal with the application. The respondent also argued that the termination notice relied on by the applicant is invalid and the issuing of the notice was not authorised by the applicant’s director. The respondent submitted that the Tribunal is not bound by Cavanagh J’s findings. In the event that the Tribunal made orders for termination and possession, the respondent sought four to five weeks to vacate the premises.
-
For the reasons that follow, I have made an order terminating the residential tenancy agreement and an order requiring…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Matautia Developments Pty Ltd v Di Liristi and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWCATCD 77
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the principle of res judicata did not apply because the previous dismissal by the Supreme Court did not involve a determination on the merits of the applicant's entitlement to possession. Instead, the Supreme Court had dismissed the application for lack of urgency. The court also held that the transfer of the matter to the Magistrates' Court was justified because the applicant's current application was urgent and the Magistrates' Court was better suited to handle such matters. The court accepted the applicant's evidence that it needed possession of the premises urgently to undertake necessary repairs and renovations.
Accordingly, the Magistrates' Court granted the applicant leave to be legally represented and terminated the residential tenancy agreement, ordering the respondent to give vacant possession of the premises to the applicant by 3 January 2022. The court did not make any orders as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Leave for legal representation is granted.
2. The residential tenancy agreement between the parties is terminated immediately and the respondent is to give vacant possession of the residential premises to the applicant on 3 January 2022.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.