Legal Research
Cases
Marshall v Berndt

Marshall v Berndt

Case [2011] VCC 384

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Marshall v Berndt [2011] VCC 384
Case: [2011] VCC 384
Decision Date: 7 April 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Marshall v Berndt [2011] VCC 384

Most Recent Citation

Livingstone v City of Melbourne [2020] VCC 1775

Cases Citing This Decision

Livingstone v City of Melbourne [2020] VCC 1775
Citation 1

…ALJR 870; Michos v Council of the City of Botany Bay [2012] NSWSC 625 ; Proprietors Strata Plan 14198 v Cowell (1989) 24 NSWLR 478; Marshall v Berndt [2011] VCC 384; Robson v Leischke (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; City of Richmond v Scantelbury [1991] 2 VR 38; Holloway v Newcastle City Council [2013] NSWDC 62; Jones v Dunk…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62
Citation 1

…uncil v Shirt [20] is apposite. His Honour states: [19] See Robson (op.cit.) at paragraph 96; Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLR 422 [20] (1980) 146 CLR 40 at pages 47-48…
Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd [1994] HCA 13
Citation 2 (Para 2)

…(1994) 179 CLR 520…
March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12
Citation 3

…issue of causation is a question of fact to be resolved as a matter of commonsense and experience.[21] [21] See March v E & M H Stramare Pty Limited (1991) 171 CLR 506, at 515 (Mason CJ), 522-3 (Deane J), and 524 (Toohey J); Curmi v McLennan [1994] 1 VR 513 26 It is also probably convenient to enunciate the relevant…
Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell [1982] HCA 15
Citation 4 (Para 5)

…ay fall short of certainty, it is not to be regarded as a mere conjecture or surmise. … .” [28] Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell (1982) 149 CLR 155 at page 169, per Mason J [29] (1951) 217 ALR 1 31 The passage in Bradshaw has been repeatedly adopted by the High Court in Luxton v Vines ;[30] Holloway v McFeeters ;[31…
Government Insurance Office of NSW v Fredrichberg [1968] HCA 54
Citation 5

…Fredrichberg (1968) 118 CLR 403, at pages 413-14, per Barwick CJ.…
Piening v Wanless [1968] HCA 7
Citation 6

…in negligence even when the principle is applicable. [22] See Anchor Products Ltd v Hedges (1966) 115 CLR 493-500, per Windeyer J; Piening v Wanless (1968) 117 CLR 498, at pages 506-508, per Barwick CJ; Government Insurance Office (NSW) v 28 Authorities such as Piening v Wanless 23 and Anchor Products Ltd v Hedges 2…
Anchor Products Ltd v Hedges [1966] HCA 70
Citation 7

…oning process and that a plaintiff bears the onus of proof in negligence even when the principle is applicable. [22] See Anchor Products Ltd v Hedges (1966) 115 CLR 493-500, per Windeyer J; Piening v Wanless (1968) 117 CLR 498, at pages 506-508, per Barwick CJ; Government Insurance Office (NSW) v 28 Authorities such…
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8
Citation 8 (Para 5)

…es v Dunkel [32]and Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell .[33] [30] (1952) 85 CLR 352, at 358 [31] (1956) 94 CLR 470, at 480-81 [32] (1959) 101 CLR 298, at 304-305 [33] ( op.cit. ) at pages 161 and 168 32 I also refer to Dahl v Grice [34] where Gobbo J referred to the question of causation in a personal injuries matter…
Holloway v McFeeters [1956] HCA 25
Citation 9 (Para 5)

…30] Holloway v McFeeters ;[31] Jones v Dunkel [32]and Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell .[33] [30] (1952) 85 CLR 352, at 358 [31] (1956) 94 CLR 470, at 480-81 [32] (1959) 101 CLR 298, at 304-305 [33] ( op.cit. ) at pages 161 and 168 32 I also refer to Dahl v Grice [34] where Gobbo J referred to the question of causa…
Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19
Citation 10 (Para 5)

…High Court in Luxton v Vines ;[30] Holloway v McFeeters ;[31] Jones v Dunkel [32]and Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v Hurrell .[33] [30] (1952) 85 CLR 352, at 358 [31] (1956) 94 CLR 470, at 480-81 [32] (1959) 101 CLR 298, at 304-305 [33] ( op.cit. ) at pages 161 and 168 32 I also refer to Dahl v Grice [34] where Gobbo J re…
Hardchrome Engineering Pty Ltd v Kambrook Distributing Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 359
Citation 11 (Para 3)

…See Hardchrome Engineering Pty Ltd v Kambrook Distributing Pty Ltd [2000] VSC 359, at paragraphs 173-174…
Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152
Citation 12

…ertaining to nuisance and negligence, particularly in the context of a tree root claim. It is convenient to enunciate some of those principles: [2] (2008) 72 NSWLR 98 • Under Australian common law, where a tree causes damage to property, there are three causes of action in tort by which the affected landowner can bri…
Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1
Citation 13

…es of his conduct, then he may be nevertheless liable if the claimant can bring his case within the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330, and in that event there is strict liability’ … .”…

AI Chat coming soon