Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited

[1999] NSWSC 126

CITATION:

Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 126

CURRENT JURISDICTION:

Common Law

FILE NUMBER(S):

20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996

HEARING DATE(S):

25 February 1999

JUDGMENT DATE:

25 February 1999

PARTIES :

JOHN MARSDEN
(Plaintiff)

v

AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
(Defendant)

JUDGMENT OF:

Levine J

COUNSEL :	I Barker Q.C. G O'L Reynolds S.C. R G McHugh (Plaintiff) W H Nicholas Q.C. J S Wheelhouse R Titterton
SOLICITORS:	Phillips Fox (Plaintiff) Mallesons Stephen Jacques (Defendant)
CATCHWORDS:	Exhortation to jury
DECISION:	See paragraph 3

- 2 -

DLJT: 15
(Ex Tempore - Revised)

THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION
DEFAMATION LIST

No. 20223 of 1995
No. 20592 of 1996

JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE

THURSDAY 25 FEBRUARY 1999

JOHN MARSDEN
(Plaintiff)

v

AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
ACN 000 145 246
(Defendant)

JUDGMENT (Exhortation to jury)
1 HIS HONOUR: Mr Barker of Queens Counsel for the plaintiff has drawn to my attention the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of 5 November 1998 in The Queen v Pantoja and the decision of that Court to the effect that, in the circumstances of that trial, where an indication has been sent to the trial Judge that the jury was unable to reach a verdict and that any further deliberation was futile, it was nonetheless appropriate that a direction in accordance with Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44, be given.
2 The note of Pantoja is in vol 5 Number 11 of the Criminal Law News but is sufficiently detailed to persuade me, leaving to one side any difference between a criminal and a civil trial, that the circumstances with which the Court of Criminal Appeal was concerned are starkly different to that confronting this Court.
3 Yesterday I did give an exhortation to the jury in the course of which from time to time I used expressions that are contained in what is known as the Black direction. This morning, subject to anything that is immediately brought to my attention by the jury upon its being brought into court, I merely propose to request that they give further consideration to the issues, bear in mind what I said to them yesterday after lunch, and to remind them that they are free to seek any further directions that might assist them.

Last Modified: