MARCHESANO -v- THE QUEEN [2000] WASCA 225
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2000] WASCA 225 | |
| COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL | |||
| Case No: | CCA:5/2000 | 8 JUNE 2000 | |
| Coram: | KENNEDY ACJ WALLWORK J PARKER J | 24/08/00 | |
| 14 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Application for leave to appeal against conviction granted Appeal against conviction dismissed Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused | ||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | ANTHONY THOMAS MARCHESANO THE QUEEN |
Catchwords: | Criminal law and procedure Possession of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply Whether police officer qualified to give evidence as to use of methylamphetamine and as to practice of mixing it with other substances prior to sale Criminal law and procedure Sentencing Possession of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply Sentence of 3-1/2 years' imprisonment with eligibility for parole not interfered with |
Legislation: | Nil |
Case References: | Anderson v The Queen (1992) 64 A Crim R 312 Bellissimo v The Queen (1996) 84 A Crim R 465 Darwell v The Queen (1997) 94 A Crim R 35 R v Dao, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 990015; 22 January 1999 Sikaloski v The Queen [2000] WASCA 63 Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486 Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v ICI Australia Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 529 Eagles v Orth [1976] Qd R 313 English Exporters (London) Ltd v Eldonwall Ltd [1973] Ch 415 Folkes v Chadd (1782) 3 Dougl 157; 99 ER 589 Hawkins v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 970194; 1 May 1997 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665 Miles v The Queen (1997) 17 WAR 518 Paparone v The Queen [2000] WASCA 127 R v Barker (1988) 34 A Crim R 141 R v Darrington (1979) 1 A Crim R 124 R v Doyle (1994) 71 A Crim R 360 R v Gardner [1980] Qd R 531 R v Marinovich (1990) 46 A Crim R 282 R v Onea (1994) 74 A Crim R 395 R v Osenkowski (1982) 5 A Crim R 394 R v Reed (1993) 65 A Crim R 434 Suresh v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 769 Transport Publishing Co Pty Ltd v Literature Board of Review (1956) 99 CLR 111 Vodanovic v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 960056; 9 February 1996 Yager v R [1977] WAR 17 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : MARCHESANO -v- THE QUEEN [2000] WASCA 225 CORAM : KENNEDY ACJ
- WALLWORK J
PARKER J
- CCA 6 of 2000
- Applicant
AND
THE QUEEN
Respondent
Catchwords:
Criminal law and procedure - Possession of methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply - Whether police officer qualified to give evidence as to use of methylamphetamine and as to practice of mixing it with other substances prior to sale
Criminal law…
Continue reading Marchesano v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
- AGLC
- Marchesano v The Queen [2000] WASCA 225
- Case
- [2000] WASCA 225
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Marchesano, was convicted of possessing methylamphetamine with intent to sell or supply. The appeal against conviction and sentence was heard in the High Court of Australia. The central legal issues revolved around the admissibility of certain police evidence and the appropriateness of the sentence imposed. The court had to determine if the police officer was qualified to provide evidence on the use of methylamphetamine and the practice of mixing it with other substances prior to sale. Additionally, the court assessed the sentence of 3½ years' imprisonment, with eligibility for parole, to determine if it was appropriate.
In ruling on these matters, the court held that the police officer's evidence was admissible as it pertained to matters within his professional experience and expertise. The officer's testimony regarding the use of methylamphetamine and the practice of mixing it with other substances was deemed relevant to establishing the appellant's intent to sell or supply the drug. Consequently, the court found that the trial judge had correctly admitted this evidence. Regarding the sentence, the court found that the punishment imposed was neither manifestly excessive nor inadequate, given the circumstances of the case. Therefore, the appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
As a result of the court's findings, the application for leave to appeal against the conviction was granted, but the appeal itself was dismissed. The application for leave to appeal against the sentence was refused. The final orders were that the appellant's application for leave to appeal against conviction was granted, but the appeal against conviction was dismissed. Additionally, the application for leave to appeal against sentence was refused.
In ruling on these matters, the court held that the police officer's evidence was admissible as it pertained to matters within his professional experience and expertise. The officer's testimony regarding the use of methylamphetamine and the practice of mixing it with other substances was deemed relevant to establishing the appellant's intent to sell or supply the drug. Consequently, the court found that the trial judge had correctly admitted this evidence. Regarding the sentence, the court found that the punishment imposed was neither manifestly excessive nor inadequate, given the circumstances of the case. Therefore, the appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
As a result of the court's findings, the application for leave to appeal against the conviction was granted, but the appeal itself was dismissed. The application for leave to appeal against the sentence was refused. The final orders were that the appellant's application for leave to appeal against conviction was granted, but the appeal against conviction was dismissed. Additionally, the application for leave to appeal against sentence was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application for leave to appeal against conviction granted
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.