Reported Decision: (2007) Aust Torts Reports 81-915
New South Wales
Court of Appeal
CITATION: Malcolm v Nationwide News Pty Limited [2007] NSWCA 254 HEARING DATE(S): 22 August 2007
JUDGMENT DATE:
18 September 2007JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Basten JA at 32; McClellan CJ at CL at 34 DECISION: The appeal is allowed with costs. CATCHWORDS: DEFAMATION – defamatory imputation – alleged defamatory imputation arising from newspaper article – article contained allegations of guilt and allegations of police suspicion of guilt – capacity of matter complained of to convey defamatory imputation – whole of the published matter to be considered – whether the trial judge erred in finding that the imputation was not capable of being conveyed LEGISLATION CITED: Defamation Act 1974 (NSW)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 28.2CASES CITED: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158
Chalmers v Payne (1835) 2 CM & R 156
Charleston & Anor v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [1995] 2 AC 65
Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd (2005) 79 ALJR 1716; [2005] HCA 52
Griffith v John Fairfax Publications [2004] NSWCA 300
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 77 ALJR 1657 at 1662; [2003] HCA 50
Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234
Mirror Newspapers Limited v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293; [1982] HCA 50
Sergi v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1983] 2 NSWLR 669PARTIES: Rohan Malcolm (Appellant)
Nationwide News Pty Limited (Respondent)FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40641/06 COUNSEL: P Jones; D Morgan (Appellant)
TD Blackburn SC; ST Chrysanthou (Respondent)SOLICITORS: Beilby Poulden Costello (Appellant)
Blake Dawson Waldron (Respondent)LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 20248/06 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Simpson J LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 13 September 2006
CA 40641/06
18 September 2007BEAZLEY JA
BASTEN JA
McCLELLAN CJ at CL
Rohan Malcolm v Nationwide News Pty Limited
Headnote
On 29 June 2005, the Daily Telegraph, of which the respondent is the proprietor, published a news article consisting of a photograph of the appellant above the published material of which complaint is made. The news article contained allegations of the appellant’s guilt in abducting and indecently assaulting a seven year old boy in combination with allegations of police suspicion of the appellant’s guilt. The appellant commenced defamation proceedings alleging that the news article conveyed the imputation that the appellant had abducted and indecently assaulted a seven year old boy.
The matter came before Simpson J for the determination, by way of a separate question, of whether the news article was capable of conveying the imputation alleged. Her Honour considered that when regard was had to the entirety of the news article, it was clear beyond reasonable doubt that what was being reported was a suspicion that the person depicted in the photograph was the person who committed the offence.
The appellant appeals from her Honour’s decision striking out the Statement of Claim alleging that her…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Malcolm v Nationwide News Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] NSWCA 254
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the trial judge had erred in finding that the imputation conveyed by the published matter was not capable of being defamatory. This required the appellate court to consider the entire published material and assess its capacity to convey a defamatory meaning about the appellant.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the trial judge had erred in their assessment. The appellate judges concluded that the newspaper article, when read as a whole, was capable of conveying a defamatory imputation concerning Mr. Malcolm. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The appeal is allowed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.