Mak v Juventus Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2024] WASC 409
•5 NOVEMBER 2024
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mak v Juventus Pty Ltd [2024] WASC 409
[2024] WASC 409
5 NOVEMBER 2024
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Mak v Juventus Pty Ltd involved the interpretation of a discretionary trust deed in light of the death of one of the jointly appointed Guardians. The dispute centred on whether the death of one Guardian resulted in the cessation of the Guardian office, and whether the powers associated with the office were held by the individuals or by the office itself. The matter was brought before the court seeking declarations regarding the proper construction of the trust deed and the implications of the Guardian's death. The court was tasked with determining whether the office of Guardian remained intact after the death of one Guardian, and if the powers associated with the office were held by the office or by the individuals themselves. Additionally, the court needed to consider the equitable principles applicable to the grant of declaratory relief, including whether a proper contradictor was present and whether the declaration sought had foreseeable consequences.
In resolving these issues, the court considered the unique facts of the long-standing trust, where the trustee had exercised both reserved and restricted powers under the assumption that the office of Guardian continued. The court found that the matter turned on its own facts, and that the interpretation of the trust deed had to be considered in this context. The court also examined the equitable principles governing declaratory relief, and determined that a proper contradictor was present and that the declaration sought had foreseeable consequences. The court exercised its discretion to grant the relief sought by the applicant, finding that the death of one Guardian did not necessarily result in the cessation of the office, and that the powers associated with the office were held by the office itself. The court's decision clarified the proper construction of the trust deed and provided guidance on the exercise of powers by the trustee in the future.
In resolving these issues, the court considered the unique facts of the long-standing trust, where the trustee had exercised both reserved and restricted powers under the assumption that the office of Guardian continued. The court found that the matter turned on its own facts, and that the interpretation of the trust deed had to be considered in this context. The court also examined the equitable principles governing declaratory relief, and determined that a proper contradictor was present and that the declaration sought had foreseeable consequences. The court exercised its discretion to grant the relief sought by the applicant, finding that the death of one Guardian did not necessarily result in the cessation of the office, and that the powers associated with the office were held by the office itself. The court's decision clarified the proper construction of the trust deed and provided guidance on the exercise of powers by the trustee in the future.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Trusts & Equity
Legal Concepts
-
Discretionary Trust
-
Declaratory Relief
-
Discretion
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Mak v Juventus Pty Ltd [2024] WASC 409
Most Recent Citation
RIVI Opportunity Fund LP v Hellyer Gold Mines Pty Ltd [2025] WASC 95
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Roy Hill Iron Ore Pty Ltd v The Minister for Mines & Petroleum
[2025] WASC 333
RIVI Opportunity Fund LP v Hellyer Gold Mines Pty Ltd
[2025] WASC 95
Roy Hill Iron Ore Pty Ltd v The Minister for Mines & Petroleum
[2025] WASC 333
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
1
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
[2005] HCA 53
Kent v SS “Maria Luisa” (No 2)
[2003] FCAFC 93
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
[2005] HCA 53