Mahnken v Saunders Logging Pty Ltd

[1994] IRCA 67

TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY  No TI 109 of 1994
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION

BETWEEN :

BARRY RONALD MAHNKEN

Applicant

AND:

SAUNDERS LOGGING PTY LTD

Respondent

COURT:               NORTHROP J
PLACE:                HOBART
DATE:                  30 AUGUST 1994

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

I propose to direct that the matter be listed for hearing at the sittings of the Court commencing 26 September 1994 at a time to be determined by the Registrar. It is noted that the anticipated length of hearing is one day.

I should indicate also, as a matter of information to those who are interested in this area, that the practice of the Court in cases of this kind where a certificate is given by the Industrial Relations Commission that no settlement has been reached is that the matter should be listed for hearing as speedily as possible after that certificate has been given. Under the rules applicable to this type of case, the applicant must specify by affidavit a summary of his or her claim, the respondent must then state by affidavit the substance of the defence if the unlawful termination is disputed and there is then a conference before the Industrial Relations Commission
at which it is important that the applicant and somebody who can speak with authority on behalf of the respondent is present. As a result of all those procedures, it should be obvious to the parties what the issues are between them and it is only in-the rarest of cases that the Court will give directions as to any further interlocutory steps such as pleadings and further affidavits. Normally, arrangements will be made to have a date fixed for hearing as early as possible.

These are in circumstances where the Parliament has created a new type of remedy, a remedy which should be made available as quickly as possible where an employee's employment has been terminated. Reinstatement may be an order that is made. If such an order is to be made, it should be made as speedily as possible.

t make those comments of a general kind to avoid repeating them in every case that follows today.

I certify that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr Justice R.M. Northrop

Associate:  .
Date: