Maher and Walsh

Case [2016] FCCA 2932


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MAHER & WALSH [2016] FCCA 2932
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Setting aside a Binding Child Support Agreement – no exceptional circumstances – enforcement of Binding Child Support Agreement – mother seeking for father to pay private school fees.

Legislation:

Australian Child Support Commentary

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, ss.95(3), 136(2)

Family Law Act 1975

Cases cited:

Jessup & Jessup [2010] FMCAfam 124

McNicol & McNicol [2009] FMCAfam 1034

Applicant: MS MAHER
Respondent: MR WALSH
File Number: BRC 9510 of 2012
Judgment of: Judge Cassidy
Hearing date: 19 September 2016
Date of Last Submission: 19 September 2016
Delivered at: Brisbane
Delivered on: 16 November 2016

REPRESENTATION

The Applicant appeared in person
The Respondent appeared in person

ORDERS

  1. That the husband pay the wife $3,923.76 plus interest being the sum owing pursuant to the Child Support Agreement dated 13 February 2013, by on before 12 December 2016.

  2. That the husband pay the wife the sum of $8,110 plus any further sum for school fees that have accrued for the 2016 year, by on or before 12 December 2016.

  3. That in the event that the husband does not pay the payments by the set date in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof the husband forthwith sign all documents and do all things to affect the sale out of Court of the real property situated at Property L, title details (omitted) in the Parish of (omitted).

  4. Upon the completion of the sale, the proceeds of the sale be applied:

    (i)firstly to pay all costs, commissions and expenses of the sale;

    (ii)secondly to discharge any mortgage and any other encumbrance affecting the real property;

    (iii)thirdly so much of the payment as is then outstanding together with interest thereon at a rate prescribed under the Family Law Act1975 (Cth) adjusted monthly from the date of this Order to the wife;

    (iv)fourthly the balance to the husband.

  5. Pursuant to s.106A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) if either party refuses or neglects to sign any document necessary to implement these orders within 14 days of a request in writing to do so, a Registrar of the Family Court of Australia is appointed to execute such document on behalf of that party.

  6. That all extant applications be otherwise dismissed save that there be liberty to apply reserved to approach Judge Cassidy’s Associate within 28 days of the date of this order with respect to any application for costs arising out of these proceedings.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Maher & Walsh is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT BRISBANE

BRC 9510 of 2012

MS MAHER

Applicant

And

MR WALSH

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The wife in her application seeks to enforce the Binding Child Support Agreement that the parties entered into on 13 February 2013.

  2. The wife seeks a sum, as at 27 April 2016 (the date her application was filed),…

Continue reading Maher and Walsh

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Maher and Walsh [2016] FCCA 2932
Case
[2016] FCCA 2932
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Maher and Walsh*, heard by Judge Cassidy, the dispute concerned financial matters between a husband and wife. The wife sought payment of sums owing under a child support agreement and for school fees, with a further application for the sale of real property if these payments were not made.

The court was required to determine the extent of the husband's financial obligations to the wife, specifically regarding arrears under a child support agreement and outstanding school fees. Additionally, the court needed to consider the appropriate mechanism for enforcing these financial orders, including the potential sale of jointly held real property.

Judge Cassidy ordered the husband to pay the wife a specific sum for arrears under the child support agreement and a further sum for accrued school fees by a set date. In the event of non-payment, the husband was directed to sign all necessary documents to facilitate the out-of-court sale of their real property. The proceeds of the sale were to be applied first to sale costs, then to discharge any encumbrances, followed by the outstanding sums owed to the wife with interest, and finally, any balance to the husband. The court also made provision under s 106A of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) for a Registrar to execute documents if a party refused to do so, and all other extant applications were dismissed with liberty to apply for costs within 28 days.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the husband pay the wife $3,923.76 plus interest being the sum owing pursuant to the Child Support Agreement dated 13 February 2013, by on before 12 December 2016.

2.

That the husband pay the wife the sum of $8,110 plus any further sum for school fees that have accrued for the 2016 year, by on or before 12 December 2016.

3.

That in the event that the husband does not pay the payments by the set date in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof the husband forthwith sign all documents and do all things to affect the sale out of Court of the real property situated at Property L, title details (omitted) in the Parish of (omitted).

4.

Upon the completion of the sale, the proceeds of the sale be applied:

(i) firstly to pay all costs, commissions and expenses of the sale;

(ii) secondly to discharge any mortgage and any other encumbrance affecting the real property;

(iii) thirdly so much of the payment as is then outstanding together with interest thereon at a rate prescribed under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) adjusted monthly from the date of this Order to the wife;

(iv) fourthly the balance to the husband.

5.

Pursuant to s.106A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) if either party refuses or neglects to sign any document necessary to implement these orders within 14 days of a request in writing to do so, a Registrar of the Family Court of Australia is appointed to execute such document on behalf of that party.

6.

That all extant applications be otherwise dismissed save that there be liberty to apply reserved to approach Judge Cassidy’s Associate within 28 days of the date of this order with respect to any application for costs arising out of these proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.