Magnum Magnetics Corporation
Case
•
[2019] APO 3
•11 January 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Magnum Magnetics Corporation [2019] APO 3
[2019] APO 3
11 January 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Magnum Magnetics Corporation, the Applicant sought an extension of time to file a divisional application in relation to a patent application. The Applicant argued that the delay was due to an error or omission, or circumstances beyond control, as permitted under section 223(2) of the relevant Act. The court had to determine whether the Applicant's failure to file the divisional application was due to an error or omission or circumstances beyond control. The Applicant provided several Statutory Declarations in support of their request, detailing the events leading up to the delay. The court examined the evidence and the statutory provisions, ultimately concluding that the Applicant's failure to file the divisional application was not due to an error or omission or circumstances beyond control. Consequently, the court refused the Applicant's request for an extension of time. The decision was made by Isaac Tan, a Delegate of the Commissioner of Patents.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Patent Law
Legal Concepts
-
Divisional Application
-
Error or Omission
-
Extension of Time
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Stephen Dall v Transpiro Pty Ltd [2023] APO 4
Cases Citing This Decision
16
Reut ROSENBLUM; Mely ROSENBLOOM; Yedidya Yochai VAN DIJK
[2023] APO 24
The Coca-Cola Company
[2023] APO 9
Stephen Dall v Transpiro Pty Ltd
[2023] APO 4
Cases Cited
19
Statutory Material Cited
0
Re Lazer Safe Pty Ltd and Commissioner of Patents
[2001] AATA 967
Re Apotex Pty Limited and Commissioner of Patents
[2008] AATA 226