Mad Keen Pty Ltd (April Cornwell) v Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd

Case

[2011] ATMO 91

14 September 2011


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Mad Keen Pty Ltd (April Cornwell) v Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd [2011] ATMO 91 [2011] ATMO 91 14 September 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned a request by Mad Keen Pty Ltd to amend the name of the opponent in a notice of opposition filed on 29 March 2010. The original opponent was listed as A. Cornwell, and Mad Keen Pty Ltd sought to substitute its own name for that of A. Cornwell. Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd contested this amendment. The decision was made by Hearing Officer Heath Wilson of the Trade Marks Hearings.

The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether it was fair and reasonable in all the circumstances to permit the amendment of the opponent's name in the notice of opposition. This involved considering Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd's opposition to the proposed change and the implications for the parties involved.

The Hearing Officer found that the requested amendment was fair and reasonable. He noted that Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd had exercised its right to contest the issue and had therefore accepted the inherent risks. The Hearing Officer directed that the name of the opponent on the notice of opposition be amended from A. Cornwell to Mad Keen Pty Ltd within one month of the decision, with the corresponding Australian Company Number to be updated. In relation to costs, the Hearing Officer awarded costs against Jenkar Developments Pty Ltd in favour of Ms Cornwell, limiting the allowable costs to the Hearing Fee, attendance costs for Dr Pullen's appearance, and the preparation of the case for the hearing. The Hearing Officer also made directions regarding the amendment in the event of an appeal.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0