MacDougal v Mitchell

Case [2015] NSWCA 389



Court of Appeal
Supreme Court

New South Wales

Case Name: 

MacDougal v Mitchell

Medium Neutral Citation: 

[2015] NSWCA 389

Hearing Date(s): 

24 November 2015

Decision Date: 

9 December 2015

Before: 

Meagher JA at [1]
Bergin CJ in Eq at [2]
Tobias AJA at [3]

Decision: 

1 Grant leave to appeal.
2 Appeal allowed in part.
3 Set aside Order 1 made by Judge R A Sorby on 27 February 2015 and in lieu thereof enter judgment for the applicant against both respondents in the sum of $110,500.
4 The respondents to pay the applicant’s costs of the summons for leave to appeal and the appeal but to have, if qualified, a certificate under the Suitors’ Fund Act 1951 (NSW).

Catchwords: 

TORTS – assault – damages – whether award of aggravated and/or exemplary damages justified – whether a ‘cushion’ for future economic loss should be awarded - applicable principles – quantum of aggravated and exemplary damages

Legislation Cited: 

Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 3B
Suitors’ Fund Act 1951 (NSW)

Cases Cited: 

Carson v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 44
Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome [1972] AC 1027
Gacic v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 99
Gray v Motor Accident Commission [1998] HCA 70; (1998) 196 CLR 1
Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; (1987) 164 CLR 1
Rogers v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 52; 216 CLR 327
State of NSW v Riley [2003] NSWCA 208; (2003) 57 NSWLR 496
State of NSW v Zreika [2012] NSWCA 37
Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd [1966] HCA 40; (1966) 117 CLR 118
Vignoli v Sydney Harbour Casino [1999] NSWSC 1113; [2000] Aust Torts Reports 81-541

Texts Cited: 

McGregor on Damages (18th ed 2009, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd)

Category: 

Principal judgment

Parties: 

Leon Peter MacDougal (Applicant)
Dale Ian Mitchell (First Respondent)
Jacob Terrence Osland (Second Respondent)

Representation: 

Counsel:
D P O’Dowd (Applicant)
No Appearance (First Respondent)
In person (Second Respondent)
 
Solicitors:
Slater and Gordon (Applicant)

File Number(s): 

2015/84875

Decision under appeal: 

 Court or Tribunal: 

District Court

  Jurisdiction: 

Civil

  Date of Decision: 

27 February 2015

  Before: 

Sorby DCJ

  File Number(s): 

2013/385047

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

JUDGMENT

  1. MEAGHER JA: I agree with Tobias AJA.

  2. BERGIN CJ in Eq: I agree with Tobias AJA.

  3. TOBIAS AJA: By Summons filed on 27 May 2015, the applicant, Leon Peter MacDougal, seeks the Court’s leave to appeal against the decision of his Honour Judge R A Sorby, of 27 February 2015 wherein it was ordered that there be judgment for the applicant against the respondents in…

Continue reading MacDougal v Mitchell

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
MacDougal v Mitchell [2015] NSWCA 389
Case
[2015] NSWCA 389
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of *MacDougal v Mitchell* concerned an appeal from a decision of Judge R A Sorby made on 27 February 2015. The applicant, MacDougal, sought to appeal against the original judgment, which had awarded damages against both respondents.

The primary legal issues before the appellate court were whether the original award of damages was justified, specifically concerning the inclusion of aggravated and/or exemplary damages, and whether a "cushion" for future economic loss should have been awarded. The court was required to consider the applicable principles for assessing the quantum of aggravated and exemplary damages.

The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal and allowed the appeal in part. It set aside the original order and entered judgment for the applicant against both respondents in the sum of $110,500. The respondents were ordered to pay the applicant’s costs of the summons for leave to appeal and the appeal, with a provision for a certificate under the *Suitors’ Fund Act 1951* (NSW) if qualified.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Grant leave to appeal.

2 Appeal allowed in part.

3 Set aside Order 1 made by Judge R A Sorby on 27 February 2015 and in lieu thereof enter judgment for the applicant against both respondents in the sum of $110,500.

4 The respondents to pay the applicant’s costs of the summons for leave to appeal and the appeal but to have, if qualified, a certificate under the Suitors’ Fund Act 1951 (NSW).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

BERGIN CJ

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: BERGIN CJ

Full text does not contain this section.