Lord Buddha Pty Ltd v Harpur

Link copied
Case Copied 66 min read

h

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

COMMERCIAL AND EQUITY DIVISION

No. 7843 of 2008

BETWEEN:
LORD BUDDHA PTY LTD (ACN 117 265 988) Plaintiff
and
PAUL HARPUR Defendant
By original proceeding
AND BETWEEN:
PAUL HARPUR Plaintiff
and
LORD BUDDHA PTY LTD First Defendant
FORVALE PTY LTD (ACN 072 984 019) Second Defendant
By counterclaim

---

JUDGE:

ROBSON J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

11 and 12 April 2011, 31 May, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 June

DATE OF JUDGMENT:

9 August 2011

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Lord Buddha Pty Ltd v Harpur

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2011] VSC 366

---

MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT – Plaintiff sold to defendant commercially zoned land at Portland – Purchaser allegedly induced to buy the land by misleading or deceptive conduct in breach of ss 52 and 53A(2) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and s 11 of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) – Purchaser allegedly informed by vendor’s real estate agent that various well known retailers intended to take tenancies at the site – Some of the representations made out – Vendor liable for misleading or deceptive conduct – Allegation that agent also engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct – Claim not made out – Agent found to be mere conduit – Purchaser did not establish that the agent endorsed or adopted the representations as to the interested tenants.

AMADIO DEFENCE – Purchaser allegedly suffering from disabilities – Pleaded Amadio defence – Disabilities not made out – If disabilities existed, vendor not aware nor should have been aware - Defence not made out.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the plaintiff on the claim and the first defendant on the cross claim Mr R S Hay
Mr J J Oswald-Jacobs
O’Donnell Salzano Lawyers
For the defendant on the claim and plaintiff on the cross claim Ms S Marks SC
Mr M Albert
Mills Oakley Lawyers
For the second defendant on cross claim Mr P Little Michael Benjamin & Associates

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 4

BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 5

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS............................................................................................................. 9

THE PEOPLE INVOLVED............................................................................................................. 10

Michael Barrett............................................................................................................................ 10

Charles Gaucci............................................................................................................................. 10

David Gibbs................................................................................................................................. 10

Erdan Hassan............................................................................................................................... 11

Paul Harpur................................................................................................................................. 11

Ronald Hutchins......................................................................................................................... 11

Bronwyn Paltaguou.................................................................................................................... 12

Michael Ramsen.......................................................................................................................... 12

David Rodden.............................................................................................................................. 12

Gordon Turner............................................................................................................................. 12

Kenneth Tunbridge..................................................................................................................... 12

Peter von Stiegler........................................................................................................................ 13

Darren Winjam............................................................................................................................ 13

MR PAUL HENRY HARPUR........................................................................................................ 13

Compound Property Investments............................................................................................ 14

Mr Harpur’s medical condition................................................................................................ 15

Mr Tunbridge’s observations on Mr Harpur’s abilities........................................................ 18

Mr Harpur’s trip to Corio with Mr Hutchins......................................................................... 19

Dr Peter McArdle’s opinion on Mr Harpur’s medical condition........................................ 20

THE ALLEGED REPRESENTATIONS....................................................................................... 21

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS....................................................................................................... 23

The Portland land............................................................................................................................ 23

David Gibbs’ acquisition and plans for the Portland land..................................................... 24

The presentation to the Glenelg Council................................................................................. 25

The retirement village................................................................................................................ 26

Mr Gibbs’ approaches to potential tenants............................................................................. 27

Mr Barrett’s and Mr Gaucci’s attempts to attract tenants and buyers................................ 28

Aldi........................................................................................................................................... 29

Betta Electrical......................................................................................................................... 29

Bunnings.................................................................................................................................. 29

Cheap as Chips......................................................................................................................... 30

Coles......................................................................................................................................... 30

Mitre 10................................................................................................................................... 31

Scotts…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Lord Buddha Pty Ltd v Harpur and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] VSC 366
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Lord Buddha Pty Ltd brought an action against Harpur, claiming that he had purchased commercially zoned land at Portland under misleading or deceptive conduct. The plaintiff further claimed that the defendant's real estate agent had engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to the sale of the land. The defendant argued that the plaintiff had breached statutory provisions, and that he had been induced to purchase the land based on the alleged misleading or deceptive conduct. The defendant also sought relief on the basis of the Amadio defence. The plaintiff claimed damages for the loss of profit and interest.

The court had to determine whether the plaintiff's real estate agent had engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in breach of ss 52 and 53A(2) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and s 11 of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic). The court also needed to decide whether the plaintiff was liable for misleading or deceptive conduct and whether the defendant was entitled to damages. The court further had to consider whether the defendant had established the Amadio defence.

The court found that the plaintiff was liable for misleading or deceptive conduct as the real estate agent had made representations to the defendant that various well-known retailers intended to take tenancies at the site, some of which were false. However, the court held that the real estate agent was not liable for misleading or deceptive conduct as the defendant had not established that the agent had endorsed or adopted the representations as to the interested tenants. The court also found that the defendant had not made out the Amadio defence, as the disabilities, if they existed, were not known or ought to have been known to the plaintiff. The court ordered that there be judgment for the defendant on the plaintiff's claim against him and that the plaintiff pay the defendant the sum of $425,000.00 and damages in the nature of interest. The court further ordered that there be judgment for Forvale Pty Ltd on the defendant's counterclaim against it.

Orders

Orders of the court

(a) there be judgment for Mr Harpur on Lord Buddha’s claim against Mr Harpur;

(b) there be judgment for Mr Harpur on his counter claim against Lord Buddha;

(c) there be judgment for Forvale Pty Ltd on Mr Harpur’s counter claim against it;

(d) pursuant to s 82 Trade Practices Act 1974 and s 159 Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) that Lord Buddha pay Mr Harpur the sum of $425,000.00 and damages in the nature of interest.

I will hear the parties on costs and the calculation of interest. I direct that Mr Harpur bring in short minutes for the consideration of the parties and the Court.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.