Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Manning v Matsen (No. 2)
[2016] NSWSC 70
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…ed to act upon that Calderbank offer. The second Calderbank offer, which had been served after the filing of evidence was acted upon. [13][2016] NSWSC 70.…
-
Wickey v McVicar
[2012] ACTCA 38
Citation 2
…ubmission that the rejection of a Calderbank offer was unreasonable should ordinarily have regard at least to the following matters: [6]See House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499 at 505. (a) the stage of the proceeding at which the offer was received; (b) the time allowed to the offeree to consider the offer; (c) the extent of…
-
Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2008] NSWCA 85
Citation 3
(Para 1)
….[3] [2] Montclare v Metlife Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2015] VSC 574 at [30]. [3] Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85 at [22].…
-
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2)
[2005] VSCA 298
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…In Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) [5] at [25] the Full Court said: [5](2005) 13 VR 435.…
-
Montclare v Metlife Insurance Ltd (No 2)
[2015] VSC 574
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…The question of whether adequate time is allowed to accept the offer is to be determined objectively.[3] [2] Montclare v Metlife Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2015] VSC 574 at [30]. [3] Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85 at [22].…
-
Aljade and MKIC v OCBC
[2004] VSC 351
Citation 6
…J said in Aljade and Malaysian Kuwaiti Investment Co SDN BHD (MKIC) v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (OCBC) (‘Aljade’)[7] as follows: [7][2004] VSC 351. “Any attempt to prescribe the reasoning which must accompany [a Calderbank] offer should be resisted. Whether there is a need for the offeror to descend to sp…