Little Creatures Brewing Pty Ltd v Bordin

Link copied
Case Copied 29 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

LITTLE CREATURES BREWING PTY LTD v BORDIN [2006] FMCA 302
BANKRUPTCY – Sequestration Order – solvency – whether refinancing through family relevant – oral loan agreement – whether sufficient evidence of solvency – whether Corporations Act provisions similar to Bankruptcy Act – ability to pay not required “from his own moneys”.
Bankruptcy Act 1966, s.5, 52(2)(a), 95A
Corporations Act 2001, s.95A
Lewis & Anor v Doran (2004) 208 ALR 385
Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666
Harrison v Lewis (2001) 19 ACLC 566
Re Sarina; Ex parte Wollondilly Shire Council (1980) 43 FLR 163
Re Capel Ex parte Caram Finance Australia Ltd (unreported) FCA per Finn J 9 April 1998
International Alpaca Management Ltd v Ensor (1999) FCA 72
Applicant: LITTLE CREATURES BREWING PTY LTD (ACN 083 392 303)
Respondent: DOMENIC BORDIN
File Number: MLG 1165 of 2005
Judgment of: McInnis FM
Hearing date: 22 February 2006
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 3 March 2006

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S.J. Waldron
Solicitors for the Applicant: Mallesons Stephen Jacques
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M.J. Galvin
Solicitors for the Respondent: Madgwicks
Solicitor for the Supporting Creditor – Australian Taxation Office: Ms R Hannan
Solicitors for the Supporting Creditor – Australian Taxation Office: ATO Legal Services
Solicitor for the Supporting Creditor – Tasman Liquor Traders: Mr L Blake
Solicitors for the Supporting Creditor – Tasman Liquor Traders: Hunt & Hunt

ORDERS

  1. A Sequestration Order be made against the estate of Domenic Bordin.

  2. The Applicant Creditor’s costs be taxed in accordance with the Federal Court Rules and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
MELBOURNE

MLG 1165 of 2005

LITTLE CREATURES BREWING PTY LTD (ACN 083 392 303)

Applicant

And

DOMENIC  BORDIN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is a creditors petition filed by Little Creatures Brewing Pty Ltd ("the creditor") seeking a sequestration order against Domenic Bordin ("the debtor").  The petition has been the subject of notices of appearance filed by two supporting creditors, namely the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia and Tasman Liquor Traders Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) ("the supporting creditors").

  2. The creditors petition relies upon a bankruptcy notice issued on 18 May 2005.  The bankruptcy notice claims that the debtor owes the creditor the amount of $29,895.14, being moneys owed to the creditor arising from a default judgment obtained in the Supreme Court of Tasmania at Hobart in proceedings number 516 of 2004 on 22 December 2004. 

  3. There is no issue taken in relation to the service of the bankruptcy notice and at the date of hearing updated affidavits as required were filed deposing to proof of debt and that the appropriate searches having been undertaken. 

  4. The debtor has relied upon a notice of intention to oppose the petition filed 28 November 2005.  In that notice the debtor refers to the following grounds:-

    “1. Applications for a refinancing of two large…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Little Creatures Brewing Pty Ltd v Bordin and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2006] FMCA 302
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Little Creatures Brewing Pty Ltd v Bordin before the Federal Court involved a dispute over a debt owed by Domenic Bordin to Little Creatures Brewing. The brewing company sought a sequestration order against Bordin, claiming that he had failed to repay a substantial debt, leading to the application for bankruptcy. The legal issues at the core of this case revolved around whether Little Creatures Brewing had a legitimate claim against Bordin, whether the debt was valid and enforceable, and whether the criteria for granting a sequestration order were satisfied. The court had to assess the evidence provided by Little Creatures Brewing regarding the debt, the correspondence and attempts to recover the debt, and the respondent's financial situation.

The Federal Court found that Little Creatures Brewing had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate its claim against Bordin. The court considered the documents and testimonies presented, confirming that Bordin owed a considerable sum to the brewing company. Additionally, the court determined that the conditions for issuing a sequestration order were met, as Bordin's financial state demonstrated an inability to pay his debts. The court was satisfied that Little Creatures Brewing had acted in good faith and followed the appropriate legal procedures in pursuing the debt. Consequently, the court granted the application for a sequestration order against Bordin's estate and ordered that the costs of the proceedings be paid by Bordin's estate in accordance with the relevant legislative provisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

A Sequestration Order be made against the estate of Domenic Bordin.

2.

The Applicant Creditor’s costs be taxed in accordance with the Federal Court Rules and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.