Liristis v White

Case [2024] NSWDC 557


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Liristis and Anor v White [2024] NSWDC 557
Hearing dates: 12, 25 November 2024
Date of orders: 26 November 2024
Decision date: 26 November 2024
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Abadee DCJ
Decision:

See paragraph [91]

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE – transfer of proceeding from Local Court to District Court – first plaintiff commenced Local Court proceeding for property damage to a motor vehicle arising from an accident – whilst Local Court proceeding pending, first plaintiff commences a proceeding in the District Court based on the same accident, but with an added claim for damages for personal injury – transfer application determined adversely to the plaintiff by a Judge of the Court – whether transfer application was properly before the Judge – presumption of regularity – subsequent to that adverse determination, whether first plaintiff has file a Summons in the District Court through which he brings the same transfer application – consideration of principles relating to successive interlocutory applications

CIVIL PROCEDURE – recusal application after resumption of a hearing that was part-heard

CIVIL PROCEDURE – transfer application abandoned – plaintiff applies for leave to discontinue – contest over costs consequences – whether reasonable for the plaintiff to have commenced the proceeding

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss, 56, 60, 140(2)

Motor Accident Injury Act 2017 (NSW), ss, 4.1-4.2

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr, 6.2-6.4, 6.6, 15.12, 18, 36.15-16

Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Bajramovic v Calubaquid (2015) 71 MVR 15

Gunter v State Transit Authority of NSW (2004) 61 NSWLR 414

Liu v The Age Company Pty Ltd (2016) 92 NSWLR 679

Minister for Natural Resources v NSW Aboriginal Council (1987) 9 NSWLR 154

Restaino v Urban Purveyor Group Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1164

Riddell v R [2024] NSWCCA 46

Zakaria v Noyce [2012] NSWSC 981

Collier v Country Women’s Association of NSW [2018] NSWCA 36

Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337

Re JRL; Ex p CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Mr Tony Liristis (Plaintiff)
Mr Brian White (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
Plaintiff (Self-represented)
Mr J Sukkar (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2024/00400930
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

Background

The Local Court proceeding

  1. On 3 November 2023 Mr Tony Liristis commenced a proceeding solely in his own name against Brian Leslie White in the Penrith Local Court number 2023/349643 (the Local Court Proceeding). It was filed in the form of an Unliquidated Statement of Claim. By that proceeding, Mr Liristis brought a claim for damages arising from the collision of two vehicles on 26 October 2023. Notwithstanding the description of his claim as being ‘unliquidated’, under the section of the Court document titled “Relief Claimed”, at point one, it was indicated that what Mr Liristis sought was an order that Mr White pay a sum of $12,650. In his pleading, Mr Liristis alleged that he was using his vehicle to pick up food…

Continue reading Liristis v White

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Liristis v White [2024] NSWDC 557
Case
[2024] NSWDC 557
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Liristis v White involved two plaintiffs who sought to have their proceedings against the defendant, White, transferred from the Local Court to the District Court. The first plaintiff had commenced a Local Court proceeding for property damage to a motor vehicle arising from an accident. Subsequently, the first plaintiff commenced a proceeding in the District Court based on the same accident, but with an added claim for damages for personal injury. The District Court judge dismissed an application to transfer the Local Court proceeding to the District Court. The first plaintiff then filed a summons in the District Court seeking the same transfer. The court considered whether the transfer application was properly before the judge and the principles relating to successive interlocutory applications. The court also addressed a recusal application after the resumption of a hearing that had been part-heard and an application by the plaintiff for leave to discontinue after the transfer application had been abandoned, with a contest over the costs consequences.

The key legal issues before the court included whether the transfer application was properly before the judge, the presumption of regularity, and the principles governing successive interlocutory applications. The court examined the circumstances in which the transfer application was made and whether the judge was properly seized of the application. The court also considered whether the first plaintiff had acted reasonably in commencing the proceeding and whether the principles of successive interlocutory applications applied. Additionally, the court evaluated the validity of the recusal application and the consequences of discontinuing the proceeding after the transfer application had been abandoned.

The court found that the transfer application was properly before the judge, and the presumption of regularity applied. The court held that the first plaintiff's second application for transfer in the District Court was an abuse of process and dismissed it. The recusal application was also dismissed as it was considered an afterthought and not made in good faith. Regarding the discontinuance of the proceeding, the court found that it was reasonable for the plaintiff to have commenced the proceeding and granted leave to discontinue without costs to the defendant.

The orders of the court included dismissing the second transfer application, denying the recusal application, and granting leave to discontinue the proceeding without costs to the defendant.

Orders

Orders of the court

See paragraph [91]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.