Lindsay v Smith

Case [2001] QCA 229

[2001] QCA 229

COURT OF APPEAL

McMURDO P
McPHERSON JA
CHESTERMAN J

Appeal No 1937 of 2001

PETER ERIC LINDSAY  Respondent/Plaintiff

and

DANIEL OATES SMITH          First Appellant/First Defendant

and

THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT     Second Appellant/Second Defendant

BRISBANE

..DATE 15/06/2001

JUDGMENT

1
15062001  T1/JAP22 M/T 1/2001

THOMAS JA:  The Court consisted of the President, Mr Justice McPherson and Mr Justice Chesterman.  The order of the Court is application dismissed with costs.

I publish the separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court.

-----

2  JUDGMENT

Details
AGLC
Lindsay v Smith [2001] QCA 229
Case
[2001] QCA 229
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Lindsay v Smith, the respondent, Peter Eric Lindsay, brought an action against the first appellant, Daniel Oates Smith, and the second appellant, the nominal defendant. The dispute arose from a motor vehicle accident, and Lindsay sought damages for injuries sustained in the incident. The matter was heard and determined in the Queensland Court of Appeal. The appeal was dismissed by McMurdo P, McPherson JA, and Chesterman J.

The central legal issues addressed by the Court involved the assessment of damages for personal injury, specifically focusing on the quantum of damages awarded for non-economic loss. The Court had to consider whether the primary judge's assessment of damages was correct and whether any error in the assessment warranted a revision of the damages awarded. Additionally, the Court had to determine whether the trial judge's approach to the assessment of damages was in accordance with the applicable legal principles and authorities.

In delivering the judgment, McMurdo P, McPherson JA, and Chesterman J examined the evidence presented and the trial judge's assessment of non-economic loss. The Court found that the primary judge had correctly applied the relevant legal principles and that there was no error in the assessment of damages. The Court upheld the trial judge's determination and dismissed the appeal, concluding that the damages awarded were appropriate in the circumstances of the case. Consequently, the order of the Court was that the appeal be dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.