| CITATION: | Lin v Maboudi t/as Vakuke Pty Ltd [2015] QCAT 79 |
| PARTIES: | Angela Shun Jy Lin (Applicant) |
| v | |
| Saied Maboudi t/as Vakuke Pty Ltd (Respondent) |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | BDL106-14 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Building matters |
| HEARING DATE: | 16 February 2015 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Member Deane |
| DELIVERED ON: | 11 March 2015 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
| ORDERS MADE: | 1. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to pay Angela Shun Jy Lin the sum of $13,517.72. 2. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to pay Angela Shun Jy Lin interest on the sum of $11,569.22 from 9 October 2013 until that sum is paid at the rate of $1.60 per day. 3. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to provide or cause Saied Maboudi to provide a written authority to Angela Shun Jy Lin to authorise her to seek a refund from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission in respect of insurance paid. 4. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to provide or cause Saied Maboudi to provide a written authority to Angela Shun Jy Lin to authorise her to seek a refund in respect of Q Leave Levy paid. 5. Each party is to bear their own costs. |
| CATCHWORDS: | DOMESTIC BUILDING DISPUTE – claim for refund of moneys paid – withdrawal by homeowner from contract – builder’s licence suspended at time ‘contract’ signed – whether contract formed COSTS – exercise of broad general discretion Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld), s 27, s 29, s 72, s 74, s 76, s 77, s 92 Smith Developments Pty Ltd v Maybrey Pty Ltd and Ors [2012] QCAT 234 Cook’s Construction P/L v SFS 007.298.633 P/L (formerly trading as Stork Food Systems Australasia P/L) [2009] QCA 75 |
APPEARANCES:
| APPLICANT: | Angela Shun Jy Lin |
| RESPONDENT: | Saied Maboudi t/as Vakuke Pty Ltd |
REPRESENTATIVES:
| APPLICANT: | Mr Trevis Mckewen |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Saied Maboudi, director of Vakuke Pty Ltd |
REASONS FOR DECISION
Ms Lin seeks a refund of all moneys paid, costs in the sum of $421.30 and interest at the rate of 5.05% per annum on the sum of $16,740 from 15 July 2013 because:
a) Vakuke’s building licence was suspended as at 9 July 2013 when the contract document was signed;
b) she withdrew from a building contract with Vakuke under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) (‘DBC Act’);
c) the contract document signed was not complete and therefore was not valid;
d) Vakuke breached a number of statutory provisions.
Vakuke denies that all moneys paid are refundable. It contends that:
a) it was not engaged to perform all of the work;
b) most of the work was performed by Bana Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd, an engineering company;
c) third parties were engaged and paid out of the moneys received;
d) its building licence was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lin v Maboudi t/as Vakuke Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] QCAT 79
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the contract was formed and thus enforceable, considering the suspension of Maboudi's licence. The court had to determine if the contract was void or if the suspension of the licence did not affect its validity. Additionally, the court needed to consider the appropriate exercise of its discretion in awarding costs.
The court found that the suspension of Maboudi’s licence rendered the contract void. This was based on statutory requirements that a building contract must be entered into by a person who holds a current building practitioner’s licence. Given that Maboudi’s licence was suspended, the contract was deemed not to have been formed, and therefore, Lin was entitled to a refund of the amounts paid. The court also exercised its discretion to award costs, directing that each party bear their own costs. Consequently, Lin was awarded a refund of $13,517.72 plus interest and was granted authorisation to seek refunds from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission and for Q Leave Levy paid.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to pay Angela Shun Jy Lin the sum of $13,517.72.
2. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to pay Angela Shun Jy Lin interest on the sum of $11,569.22 from 9 October 2013 until that sum is paid at the rate of $1.60 per day.
3. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to provide or cause Saied Maboudi to provide a written authority to Angela Shun Jy Lin to authorise her to seek a refund from the Queensland Building and Construction Commission in respect of insurance paid.
4. Vakuke Pty Ltd is to provide or cause Saied Maboudi to provide a written authority to Angela Shun Jy Lin to authorise her to seek a refund in respect of Q Leave Levy paid.
5. Each party is to bear their own costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.