SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Lewis (by his litigation guardian P Osborne) v Bundrock & Anor [2008] QSC 189
PARTIES:
DAVID WILLIAM LEWIS (BY HIS LITIGATION GUARDIAN PATRICIA OSBORNE)
(applicant)
v
HAZEL LORRAINE BUNDROCK
(first respondent)
SUNCORP METWAY INSURANCE LTD
(ACN 83 075 695 966)
(second respondent)FILE NO/S:
2096 of 2007
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
29 August 2008
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
11 April 2008
JUDGE:
Martin J
ORDER:
The administration expenses payable by the first and second respondents be fixed at $184,174
CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES – measure of trustee’s management fee, where order is sought fixing that fee, whether the management fee should be added to the capital sum for the purpose of calculating the fee payable.
DAMAGES – measure of trustee’s management fee, where order is sought fixing that fee, whether the tax deductibility of component of the management fees should be brought into account in calculation of fees.
Buckman v M & K Napier Constructions Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 546
Curry v Aughey Unreported, Holmes J, BS7631 of 2001, 23 February 2005
Haywood v Collaroy Services Beach Club Ltd [2006] NSWSC 566
Robinson v Beatty[2006] QSC 11
Todorovic v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402COUNSEL:
DA Reid on behalf of the applicant
SC Williams for the first and second respondentsSOLICITORS:
Murphy Schmidt solicitors on behalf of the applicant
Eardly Motterani for the first and second respondents
In April 2003 the applicant was severely injured in a motor vehicle accident. Four years later, in March 2007, his claim was settled and on 21 March 2007 White J made a number of orders as part of the process of sanctioning that settlement. They included:
“1. …
2.Pursuant to s.12 and s.245 of the Guardianship and Administration Act the National Australia Trustees be appointed as Administrator to administer the moneys to be paid to it on behalf of the Plaintiff after payment of the sums referred to in paragraph 5.
3.…
4.The appointed Administrator:
(a)take possession of and control and manage the Trust Fund, including the administration fees to be determined as provided for in paragraph 5 hereof, in such a manner as the Administrator thinks fit for the benefit of the Plaintiff generally with the powers and duties defined and conferred in the Trusts Act1973 until the Plaintiff shall cease to be under a disability;
(b) be entitled to charge remuneration for its services of such administration.
5. That:
(a)The settlement sum of $1,400,000.00 be paid by the Defendants within 21 days of receipt of the letter of clearance checks from Centrelink and the Health Insurance Commission as follows:-
…
(b)The administration fees properly charged by a reasonable trustee to be agreed (subject to sanction) or failing agreement and sanction to be determined by the Court be paid within 21 days of the sanction or determination thereof by the Court by the Defendants to the Plaintiff's administrator, whose receipt thereof shall be sufficient discharge.
…”
After…
Continue reading Lewis v Bundrock
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Lewis v Bundrock [2008] QSC 189
- Case
- [2008] QSC 189
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court considered the relevant authorities and concluded that the management fees should not be added to the capital sum for the purpose of calculating the fees payable. The Court held that the management fees should be calculated based on the capital sum alone, without including the fees themselves. Furthermore, the Court held that the tax deductibility of the management fees should not be taken into account when calculating the fees payable. The Court determined that the administration expenses payable by the respondents were $184,174. This amount was fixed by the Court, providing clarity and certainty to the parties involved in the dispute.
Orders
Orders of the court
The administration expenses payable by the first and second respondents be fixed at $184,174
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.