Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Limited (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read

LEWINCAMP v ACP MAGAZINES LIMITED (NO 2)
[2008] ACTSC 73 (13 AUGUST 2008)

INTEREST ON DAMAGES – damages for defamation – whether 4 per cent appropriate rate – rate not to be applied as if all damage occurred at time of publication

Held: rate of 3 per cent appropriate in the circumstances.

COSTS – claim for indemnity costs – Calderbank letter – allegation of unreasonable conduct prior to Calderbank letter

Held: indemnity costs awarded for period after Calderbank letter, not awarded for period prior to letter.

INTEREST ON COSTS – default position under Court Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT) r 1617 interest payable from date costs assessed – no detailed submissions – parties given liberty to make further submissions

VINDICATION ORDER – order sought under Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) s 122 – relevant publication no longer published – not appropriate to make vindication statement part of court orders

Held: no vindication order should be made.

Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225
Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397
Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Ltd  [2008] ACTSC 69
MPB (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657
Osborne v Kelly (1999) 75 SASR 392

Dal Pont, GE, Law of Costs (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003)

Court Procedure Rules 2006 r 1617

Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) s 122

No. SC 578 of 2004

Judge:              Besanko J
Supreme Court of the ACT

Date:               13 August 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE       )
  )          No. SC 578 of 2004
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY    )

FRANK LEWINCAMP       

v

ACP MAGAZINES LIMITED

ORDER

Judge:  Besanko J
Date:  13 August 2008
Place:  Adelaide (via videolink with Canberra)

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to the plaintiff fixed in the sum of $47,866.44.

  1. The defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of action assessed on the following basis:

    (1)       a party and party basis up to and including 12 June 2007;

    (2)an indemnity basis from 12 June 2007 up to but excluding the application for these orders; and

    (3)a party and party basis in relation to the application for these orders.

  1. Liberty to the parties to make further submissions in writing on the question of interest on costs; the plaintiff within 14 days and the defendant within 28 days.

BESANKO J:

  1. On 23 July 2008 I entered judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in this action in the sum of $375,000. I reserved for further consideration questions of interest, vindication of the plaintiff’s reputation and costs.

  1. The plaintiff seeks the following orders:

1.   That the defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to him at a rate of 3 per cent from the date of the publications to the date of judgment being a sum of $47,866.44;

2.   That the defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of the proceedings, including any applications in the proceedings, on an indemnity basis;

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Limited (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] ACTSC 73
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Limited (No 2) involved a defamation claim brought by the plaintiff against the defendant. The plaintiff sought damages for defamation, interest on those damages, indemnity costs, interest on costs, and a vindication order. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory. The primary legal issues addressed were the appropriate rate of interest on damages, the entitlement to indemnity costs, the calculation of interest on costs, and the appropriateness of a vindication order.

The court determined that a 3% interest rate was appropriate on the damages awarded, rejecting the plaintiff's contention that a higher rate should be applied. Regarding indemnity costs, the court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to indemnity costs from the date of the Calderbank letter and onwards but not for the period before it. The court found that the defendant's conduct prior to the Calderbank letter did not warrant an award of indemnity costs. On the issue of interest on costs, the court noted that the parties had not made detailed submissions and therefore granted the parties liberty to submit further written arguments on this matter.

Lastly, concerning the vindication order, the court held that it was not appropriate to include such an order in the court's final orders since the relevant publication was no longer available. The court declined to make a vindication statement part of the court orders, finding it unnecessary in the circumstances. The court's final orders included the defendant paying interest on the damages awarded, indemnity costs from the date of the Calderbank letter, and granted liberty to the parties to further address the issue of interest on costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to the plaintiff fixed in the sum of $47,866.44.

2. The defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of action assessed on the following basis:

(1) a party and party basis up to and including 12 June 2007;

(2) an indemnity basis from 12 June 2007 up to but excluding the application for these orders; and

(3) a party and party basis in relation to the application for these orders.

3. Liberty to the parties to make further submissions in writing on the question of interest on costs; the plaintiff within 14 days and the defendant within 28 days.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.