LEWINCAMP v ACP MAGAZINES LIMITED (NO 2)
[2008] ACTSC 73 (13 AUGUST 2008)
INTEREST ON DAMAGES – damages for defamation – whether 4 per cent appropriate rate – rate not to be applied as if all damage occurred at time of publication
Held: rate of 3 per cent appropriate in the circumstances.
COSTS – claim for indemnity costs – Calderbank letter – allegation of unreasonable conduct prior to Calderbank letter
Held: indemnity costs awarded for period after Calderbank letter, not awarded for period prior to letter.
INTEREST ON COSTS – default position under Court Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT) r 1617 interest payable from date costs assessed – no detailed submissions – parties given liberty to make further submissions
VINDICATION ORDER – order sought under Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) s 122 – relevant publication no longer published – not appropriate to make vindication statement part of court orders
Held: no vindication order should be made.
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225
Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397
Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Ltd [2008] ACTSC 69
MPB (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657
Osborne v Kelly (1999) 75 SASR 392
Dal Pont, GE, Law of Costs (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003)
Court Procedure Rules 2006 r 1617
Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT) s 122
No. SC 578 of 2004
Judge: Besanko J
Supreme Court of the ACT
Date: 13 August 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE )
) No. SC 578 of 2004
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY )
FRANK LEWINCAMP
v
ACP MAGAZINES LIMITED
ORDER
Judge: Besanko J
Date: 13 August 2008
Place: Adelaide (via videolink with Canberra)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to the plaintiff fixed in the sum of $47,866.44.
The defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of action assessed on the following basis:
(1) a party and party basis up to and including 12 June 2007;
(2)an indemnity basis from 12 June 2007 up to but excluding the application for these orders; and
(3)a party and party basis in relation to the application for these orders.
Liberty to the parties to make further submissions in writing on the question of interest on costs; the plaintiff within 14 days and the defendant within 28 days.
BESANKO J:
On 23 July 2008 I entered judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in this action in the sum of $375,000. I reserved for further consideration questions of interest, vindication of the plaintiff’s reputation and costs.
The plaintiff seeks the following orders:
1. That the defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to him at a rate of 3 per cent from the date of the publications to the date of judgment being a sum of $47,866.44;
2. That the defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of the proceedings, including any applications in the proceedings, on an indemnity basis;
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lewincamp v ACP Magazines Limited (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] ACTSC 73
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court determined that a 3% interest rate was appropriate on the damages awarded, rejecting the plaintiff's contention that a higher rate should be applied. Regarding indemnity costs, the court ruled that the plaintiff was entitled to indemnity costs from the date of the Calderbank letter and onwards but not for the period before it. The court found that the defendant's conduct prior to the Calderbank letter did not warrant an award of indemnity costs. On the issue of interest on costs, the court noted that the parties had not made detailed submissions and therefore granted the parties liberty to submit further written arguments on this matter.
Lastly, concerning the vindication order, the court held that it was not appropriate to include such an order in the court's final orders since the relevant publication was no longer available. The court declined to make a vindication statement part of the court orders, finding it unnecessary in the circumstances. The court's final orders included the defendant paying interest on the damages awarded, indemnity costs from the date of the Calderbank letter, and granted liberty to the parties to further address the issue of interest on costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The defendant pay to the plaintiff interest on the damages awarded to the plaintiff fixed in the sum of $47,866.44.
2. The defendant pay to the plaintiff his costs of action assessed on the following basis:
(1) a party and party basis up to and including 12 June 2007;
(2) an indemnity basis from 12 June 2007 up to but excluding the application for these orders; and
(3) a party and party basis in relation to the application for these orders.
3. Liberty to the parties to make further submissions in writing on the question of interest on costs; the plaintiff within 14 days and the defendant within 28 days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.