Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Leonard v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 126
PARTIES: APPLICANT
Mr B Leonard and Carnegie Credit Management Services Pty LtdRESPONDENT
Ku-ring-gai CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 11389 of 2004
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :-
Dual occupancy
Character of area
.LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 149
Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948
State Environmental Planning Policy 53
Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance
Residential Design Manual – Development Control Plan 38
.CASES CITED: Leonard v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 330;
Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2004] NSWLEC 363;
Tenacity Consulting v Warringah [2004] NSWLEC 140;
.DATES OF HEARING: 18 and 22 March 2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
03/30/2005LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANTS
RESPONDENT
Mr A Galasso, barrister
INSTRUCTED BY
Maddocks Solicitors
Ms J Jagot, barrister
INSTRUCTED BY
Deacons Solicitors
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESMOORE C
30 March 2005
JUDGMENT04/11389 B Leonard & Carnegie Credit Management Services Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council
Introduction
1 Commissioner: This is an appeal pursuant to s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) against the deemed (and subsequent actual) refusal by Ku-ring-gai Council (the council) of Development Application 997/04 for construction of three dwellings on what is presently Lot D in DP 324517, known as 20 Warwick Street, Killara (the site). As the council has approved a subdivision of the site into two allotments, the present application seeks consent to construct a single dwelling on the proposed allotment fronting Warwick Street and a detached dual occupancy development on the proposed rear, battle-axe allotment.
2 In June 2004, Cowdroy J dealt with (and refused) Development Application 1652/03 to construct two detached dual occupancy developments on the site (subdivided in a slightly different configuration): see Leonard v Ku-ring-gai Council [2004] NSWLEC 330.
3 As a consequence, the position is that, if I reached a factual conclusion on any issue which differed from that reached by Cowdroy J, I would be obliged to articulate my reasons for drawing such different conclusion: see Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2004] NSWLEC 363.
The site
4 The site has an area of 2928 sq m. It has a frontage to Warwick Street of 41.7 m and a depth of ~ 70 m. It is located on the western (low) side of Warwick Street. Although the site is not squarely east-west oriented, for the purposes of this decision, I will treat the Warwick Street boundary as being to the east.
5 The site slopes ~ 13 m from front to rear. It also slopes, more gently, down from south to north. A watercourse follows the northern boundary of the site. A number of large trees, mainly Sydney Blue Gums, are growing beside the creek or in the riparian zone. Other trees are scattered throughout the site, which is currently developed with a single dwelling house located towards the centre of the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Leonard v Ku-ring-gai Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] NSWLEC 126
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.