NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION: Leda Pty. Limited v. Weerden & Anor. (No.2) [2007] NSWCA 283
FILE NUMBER(S):
40231/06
HEARING DATE(S): Matter dealt with on written submissions in Chambers
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 October 2007
PARTIES:
Leda Pty. Limited - appellant
John Weerden - respondent/cross-appellant
Leisure Management Pty. Limited - cross-respondent
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA McColl JA Handley AJA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): ED 3503/05
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Gzell J
COUNSEL:
SOLICITORS:
Paul Bard Lawyers, Sydney for appellant and cross-respondent
Blake Dawson Waldron Lawyers, Sydney for respondent/cross-appellant
CATCHWORDS:
COSTS - Offer of compromise below rejected - Offer of compromise on appeal also rejected - Indemnity costs of appeal extends to period before offer made where offer also made below
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - Interest - Where only part of the total costs are awarded - Interest calculated in same proportion as costs allowed to total costs
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
Lahoud v. Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126
DECISION:
The Court makes the following additional orders:3. Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis.4. In this order: X equals the total amount of costs and disbursements paid or liable to be paid to the respondent's legal advisers in connection with these proceedings; Y equals the total amount of costs and disbursements allowed on assessment to the respondent in connection with these proceedings; and The Allowed Percentage equals ((Y/X) x 100)%. Appellant to pay to the respondent interest on costs and disbursements, at the rates set out in Schedule 5 to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, on the Allowed Percentage of each amount for or on account of costs and disbursements actually paid to his legal advisers by or on behalf of the respondent, from the date of payment of each such amount until the first to occur of: (a) such time as the appellant has paid the costs due to the respondent under order 3 above, or (b) any further order relating to interest on costs in these proceedings. 5. Reserve liberty to apply on 7 days' notice for any further order pursuant to paragraph 4(b).
JUDGMENT:
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40231/06
ED 3503/05HODGSON JA
McCOLL LJA
HANDLEY AJAMonday 15 October 2007
LEDA PTY. LIMITED V. WEERDEN & ANOR. (NO.2)
Judgment
THE COURT: On 18 July 2007, the Court of Appeal gave judgment in which it dismissed Leda’s appeal with costs, and dismissed Mr. Weerden’s cross-appeal with no order as to costs.
Pursuant to directions given on that day, Mr. Weerden has applied for orders that his costs be assessed on an indemnity basis, and that there be interest on costs and disbursements from the time they were paid.
Mr. Weerden had made an offer of compromise below, in substance that there be a verdict for Mr. Weerden with each party bearing its own costs. Following the first instance judgment given on 29 March 2006 and the bringing…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Leda Pty Ltd v Weerden (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] NSWCA 283
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the costs of the appeal should be awarded on an indemnity basis, and how interest should be calculated on the awarded costs, especially when only a portion of the total costs incurred were ultimately allowed. The Court also had to determine the extent to which an indemnity costs order for the appeal should encompass the period prior to a relevant offer of compromise being made.
The Court ordered that the costs of the appeal be assessed on an indemnity basis. In relation to interest on costs, the Court established a formula to calculate the interest payable. This formula involved determining the "Allowed Percentage" of costs, calculated as the ratio of allowed costs to total incurred costs, expressed as a percentage. The appellant was ordered to pay interest on the allowed percentage of each amount actually paid for costs and disbursements, from the date of payment until the costs were fully paid or a further order was made. Liberty to apply was reserved for further orders concerning interest.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court makes the following additional orders:3. Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis.4. In this order: X equals the total amount of costs and disbursements paid or liable to be paid to the respondent's legal advisers in connection with these proceedings; Y equals the total amount of costs and disbursements allowed on assessment to the respondent in connection with these proceedings; and The Allowed Percentage equals ((Y/X) x 100)%. Appellant to pay to the respondent interest on costs and disbursements, at the rates set out in Schedule 5 to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, on the Allowed Percentage of each amount for or on account of costs and disbursements actually paid to his legal advisers by or on behalf of the respondent, from the date of payment of each such amount until the first to occur of: (a) such time as the appellant has paid the costs due to the respondent under order 3 above, or (b) any further order relating to interest on costs in these proceedings. 5. Reserve liberty to apply on 7 days' notice for any further order pursuant to paragraph 4(b).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.