QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION: Lawless v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2019] QCAT 32 PARTIES: AMANDA GAY LAWLESS
(applicant)
v QUEENSLAND BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION
(respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S: GAR049-16 MATTER TYPE: General administrative review matters DELIVERED ON: 18 February 2019 HEARING DATE: 23 October 2017 HEARD AT: Maroochydore DECISION OF: Member Ann Fitzpatrick ORDERS: 1. The decision of the respondent, Queensland Building and Construction Commission, made 13 January 2016 is confirmed in relation to its direction to the builder Ducon Pty Ltd to rectify damaged stormwater drainage pipes and to install flexible fittings. The decision is otherwise amended as set out in the following orders.
2. The Queensland Building and Construction Commission direct rectification of vertical control joints to comply with AS4773, such direction to be made to the licensed contractor who retro-fitted the vertical control joints or to such other licensed contractor as the QBCC may choose in accordance with s 71A of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld).
3. The Queensland Building and Construction Commission direct Ducon Pty Ltd to repair two category 2 cracks noted in the Flanagan Report 4585, dated August 2016 as:
(a) defects 16,17 and 18, being one long crack; and
(b) defect 28.
Alternatively, the work be performed under the statutory insurance scheme.
All repair work to match existing wall texture and repainting to match existing colour.
CATCHWORDS: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – BUILDERS – STATUTORY POWER TO REQUIRE RECTIFICATION OF DEFECTIVE OR INCOMPLETE
BUILDING WORK – whether evidence of defective building work – causes of cracking in dwelling – whether consequential damage occurred – whether fair to direct builder to rectify – where builder in liquidation
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS – QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – where delay through no fault of the applicant – sufficient reason for extension of time for making a direction
Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act
1991 (Qld), s 71H, s 72, s 72A(4), s 86(1)(e), s 87Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 20, s 24, s 61
Delahunty v QBSA [2013] QCAT 639
Doolan v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2017] QCAT 58
QBSA v D’Rozario, R and Anor [2003] QBT 12
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
Applicant: D Favell instructed by Spire Law Respondent:
S Seefeld instructed by Holding Redlich
REASONS FOR DECISION
The applicant, Ms Lawless, complained to the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (QBCC) on 17 July 2015 that her dwelling at 43 Hannay Street, Moranbah suffers extensive cracking to external walls across the entry, garage at the front, and down the right side of the garage and severe and expanding cracks outside the laundry.
The applicant seeks orders that would enable defective building work and consequential damage to be rectified.1 To that end she has sought a review of a decision of the respondent made on 13 January 2016.
The reviewable decision results from a senior internal review officer of the QBCC conducting an internal review in relation to an earlier decision made not…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Lawless v Queensland Building and Construction Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] QCAT 32
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues that the Tribunal was required to determine were whether there was evidence of defective building work that caused the cracking in the dwelling, and whether it was fair to direct the builder to rectify the defects where the builder was in liquidation. Additionally, the Tribunal was required to consider whether the delay in making the application was sufficient reason for extending the time for making a direction.
The Tribunal found that there was evidence of defective building work that caused the cracking in the dwelling. The Tribunal also found that it was fair to direct Ducon to rectify the defects, despite being in liquidation, as the defects were significant and posed a risk to the safety and stability of the dwelling. The Tribunal noted that the delay in making the application was not through the fault of the applicant, and therefore, was sufficient reason for extending the time for making a direction.
In relation to the orders, the Tribunal confirmed the decision of the QBCC in relation to its direction to Ducon to rectify the damaged stormwater drainage pipes and to install flexible fittings. However, the Tribunal amended the decision to require the QBCC to direct the rectification of vertical control joints to comply with AS4773, such direction to be made to the licensed contractor who retro-fitted the vertical control joints or to such other licensed contractor as the QBCC may choose. Additionally, the QBCC was directed to direct Ducon to repair two category 2 cracks, alternatively, the work be performed under the statutory insurance scheme.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The decision of the respondent, Queensland Building and Construction Commission, made 13 January 2016 is confirmed in relation to its direction to the builder Ducon Pty Ltd to rectify damaged stormwater drainage pipes and to install flexible fittings. The decision is otherwise amended as set out in the following orders.
2. The Queensland Building and Construction Commission direct rectification of vertical control joints to comply with AS4773, such direction to be made to the licensed contractor who retro-fitted the vertical control joints or to such other licensed contractor as the QBCC may choose in accordance with s 71A of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld).
3. The Queensland Building and Construction Commission direct Ducon Pty Ltd to repair two category 2 cracks noted in the Flanagan Report 4585, dated August 2016 as:
(a) defects 16,17 and 18, being one long crack; and
(b) defect 28.
Alternatively, the work be performed under the statutory insurance scheme.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.