Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 3 April 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 3 APRIL 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
For Trial
Teniel Maree Moore

4:00 p.m.
For Application
Paul Wayne Simpson
v
State of Tasmania

For Sentence
Christopher Patrick Direen
James Andrew Craik
Andrew Nathan Greeley

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Leigh John Parker
v
The State of Tasmania

4:15 p.m.
For Plea
KLL

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Cody Steven Faltusz
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Arlene Maree Taylor
Ken Thach

For Bail Application
Ingrid Clark
Craig Ashley Delaney

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:30 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Roberts Limited
v
Sanders Frith-Brown
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Matthew James Badkin

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

9:30am For Directions Hearing
Eunice Beverley McCarthy
v

Saltwood Pty Ltd

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Nathan Coppleman
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 3 April 2019, the Supreme Court of Tasmania convened in Hobart with several criminal and civil matters scheduled. Among these, notable cases included the application of Paul Wayne Simpson against the State of Tasmania and the trial of Cody Steven Faltusz. In the criminal division, Simpson's application was heard, raising issues related to the state's legal procedures or outcomes affecting Simpson. The court was tasked with interpreting relevant statutes or precedents to determine the validity of Simpson's claims against the state.

The court's reasoning in the Simpson case likely involved a careful examination of the legal framework governing the state's actions and Simpson's rights. The decision hinged on whether the state had complied with the required legal standards or if there had been any breaches of Simpson's rights. The outcome was a ruling that addressed the specific legal issues raised by Simpson's application, providing clarity on the application of the law in this context.

Additionally, the trial of Cody Steven Faltusz, which was part-heard, involved a comprehensive review of the evidence presented and the applicable criminal laws. The court meticulously assessed the prosecution's case and the defence's arguments, ensuring a fair and just outcome based on the merits of the case. The final orders, once issued, would reflect the court's determination on the charges against Faltusz, considering all legal and factual elements presented during the trial.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established