SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA
COURT OF APPEAL
S APCR 2010 0376
| HENRIK LARSEN | Appellant |
| v | |
| THE QUEEN | Respondent |
---
| JUDGES | NEAVE and HANSEN JJA, BEACH AJA |
| WHERE HELD | MELBOURNE |
| DATE OF HEARING | 21 October 2011 |
| DATE OF JUDGMENT | 28 October 2011 |
| MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION | [2011] VSCA 325 |
| JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM | DPP v Larsen (Unreported, County Court of Victoria, Judge Jenkins, 12 October 2010) |
---
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years – Enter into an agreement for child sex service – 2 victims – Possess and transmit child pornography – Total effective sentence of 7 years 9 months’ imprisonment, with non-parole period of 4 years 6 months not manifestly excessive – Incorrect maximum penalties referred to by sentencing judge – No different sentences should be passed – Appeal dismissed – No point of principle.
---
| Appearances: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Appellant | Mr JE McLouglin | Victoria Legal Aid |
| For the Crown | Mr BF Kissane | Mr C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions |
NEAVE JA:
HANSEN JA:
BEACH AJA:
Introduction
On 30 September 2010, the appellant pleaded guilty, and a plea was heard, in relation to the charges set out below. On 12 October 2010, her Honour Judge Jenkins sentenced the appellant as follows:
Charge on Indictment
Offence
Maximum
Sentence
Cumulation
1
Knowingly using an online information service contrary to s 57A of the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) (Enforcement) Act 1995 (Vic)
10 years imp.
15 months imp.
8 months imp.
2
(Rep.Charge)
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
30 months imp.
2 years imp.
3
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
2 years imp.
6 months imp.
4
(Rolled up Charge)
Enter into an agreement for child sex service
15 years imp.
2 years imp.
6 months imp.
5
Indecent act with or in the presence of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
12 months imp.
3 months imp.
6
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
2 years imp.
6 months imp.
7
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
2 years imp.
8
Indecent act with or in the presence of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
12 months imp.
9
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
10 years imp.
3 years imp.
Base
10
Knowingly possess child pornography
5 years imp.
12 months imp.
4 months imp.
Total Effective Sentence:
7 years, 9 months imp.
Non-Parole Period:
4 years, 6 months imp.
The appellant was sentenced as a serious sexual offender pursuant to s 6F of the Sentencing Act 1991 on charges 3 to 10. As a result, in determining the length of any sentence of imprisonment, the Court was required, on charges 3 to 10, to regard the protection of the community from the offender as the principal purpose for which the sentence was to be imposed.[1] Under s 6E of the Sentencing Act 1991 the…
Continue reading Larsen v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Larsen v The Queen [2011] VSCA 325
- Case
- [2011] VSCA 325
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court noted that while the maximum penalties for the child pornography offences were incorrectly referenced, this did not impact the overall sentence as the maximum penalty for all offences combined was correctly applied. The court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the trial judge had considered all relevant factors. The court further determined that separate sentences for each offence were not warranted as the offences were part of a single course of conduct.
The appeal was dismissed as there was no point of principle involved and the sentence was deemed to be appropriate. The court held that the trial judge's approach was correct and that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The appellant's appeal was rejected, and the original sentence was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.