FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 1341
File number: NSD 727 of 2020 Judgment of: KATZMANN J Date of judgment: 18 September 2020 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS LAW — Application for reinstatement of a deregistered company Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 601AH(2) Cases cited: Arnold World Trading Pty Ltd v ACN 133 427 335 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1369; 80 ACSR 670
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] NSWSC 316; 174 ALR 688; 19 ACLC 341; 34 ACSR 232
Donmastry Pty Ltd v Albarran [2004] NSWSC 632
James v Leighton Holdings Limited [2013] FCA 1115
Re Proserpine Pty Ltd [1980] 1 NSWLR 745
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection Number of paragraphs: 20 Date of last submission/s: 13 August 2020 Date of hearing: Heard on the papers Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L T Livingston Solicitor for the Applicant: Gordon Legal Solicitor for the First Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear ORDERS
NSD 727 of 2020 BETWEEN: THOMAS EDWARD KYNE
Applicant
AND: CIMIC GROUP LIMITED (ACN 004 482 982)
First Respondent
LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 002 035) IN ITS FORMER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION FUND
Second Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
KATZMANN J
DATE OF ORDER:
18 SEPTEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035).
2.Costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
KATZMANN J:
On 3 July 2020 Thomas Edward Kyne instituted proceedings in this Court seeking damages or equitable compensation from CIMIC Group Limited and Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited in its former capacity as trustee of the Leighton Superannuation Fund (together “the respondents”). Mr Kyne alleges that he was formerly employed by Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (now known as CPB Contractors Pty Ltd), a wholly owned subsidiary of Leighton Holdings Limited, now known as CIMIC, and a member of the Fund. Leighton Superannuation has since been deregistered.
No defence has been filed.
In his statement of claim Mr Kyne alleges that, by a letter dated 17 September 1993, the respondents invited him to transfer from the defined benefits section of the Fund to a new accumulated benefits section. The letter enclosed a number of documents. One of those documents compared the benefits of the two sections. According to the pleading, it included a guarantee that, in the event that Mr Kyne transferred from the defined to the accumulated benefits section, any benefit payable to him…
Continue reading Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 1341
- Case
- [2020] FCA 1341
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the deregistration of the company was unjust and whether it should be reinstated under s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001. The court considered whether the applicant had established that the deregistration was unjust and whether the public interest would be served by reinstating the company. The court also examined whether the applicant had a sufficient connection to the company to be able to seek reinstatement.
The court found that the deregistration was unjust because the applicant had a sufficient connection to the company and the rights of the members, particularly the superannuation members, would be prejudiced if the company was not reinstated. The court was satisfied that the applicant had established that the company should be reinstated in the interests of justice. The court also found that the public interest would be served by reinstating the company as it would preserve the rights of the members. Accordingly, the court ordered that the registration of the company be reinstated.
The court made an order pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035). The court also ordered that the costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause. The orders were made under Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035).
2. Costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.