Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited

Case [2020] FCA 1341


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 1341  

File number: NSD 727 of 2020
Judgment of: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 18 September 2020
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS LAW — Application for reinstatement of a deregistered company  
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 601AH(2)
Cases cited:

Arnold World Trading Pty Ltd v ACN 133 427 335 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1369; 80 ACSR 670

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] NSWSC 316; 174 ALR 688; 19 ACLC 341; 34 ACSR 232

Donmastry Pty Ltd v Albarran [2004] NSWSC 632

James v Leighton Holdings Limited [2013] FCA 1115

Re Proserpine Pty Ltd [1980] 1 NSWLR 745

Wedgewood Hallam Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Combined Building Consultants Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 439

Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 20
Date of last submission/s: 13 August 2020
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L T Livingston
Solicitor for the Applicant: Gordon Legal
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Herbert Smith Freehills
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear

ORDERS

NSD 727 of 2020
BETWEEN:

THOMAS EDWARD KYNE

Applicant

AND:

CIMIC GROUP LIMITED (ACN 004 482 982)

First Respondent

LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION PTY LIMITED (ACN 001 002 035) IN ITS FORMER CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE LEIGHTON SUPERANNUATION FUND

Second Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

KATZMANN J

DATE OF ORDER:

18 SEPTEMBER 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035).

2.Costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

KATZMANN J:

  1. On 3 July 2020 Thomas Edward Kyne instituted proceedings in this Court seeking damages or equitable compensation from CIMIC Group Limited and Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited in its former capacity as trustee of the Leighton Superannuation Fund (together “the respondents”).  Mr Kyne alleges that he was formerly employed by Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (now known as CPB Contractors Pty Ltd), a wholly owned subsidiary of Leighton Holdings Limited, now known as CIMIC, and a member of the Fund.  Leighton Superannuation has since been deregistered.

  2. No defence has been filed.

  3. In his statement of claim Mr Kyne alleges that, by a letter dated 17 September 1993, the respondents invited him to transfer from the defined benefits section of the Fund to a new accumulated benefits section.  The letter enclosed a number of documents.  One of those documents compared the benefits of the two sections.  According to the pleading, it included a guarantee that, in the event that Mr Kyne transferred from the defined to the accumulated benefits section, any benefit payable to him…

Continue reading Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kyne v CIMIC Group Limited [2020] FCA 1341
Case
[2020] FCA 1341
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Kyne, sought to have the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited reinstated. The company, which had been deregistered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), was a subsidiary of CIMIC Group Limited. The applicant argued that the deregistration was unjust and that the company should be reinstated as it was essential to preserve the rights of the members, particularly the superannuation members. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the deregistration of the company was unjust and whether it should be reinstated under s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001. The court considered whether the applicant had established that the deregistration was unjust and whether the public interest would be served by reinstating the company. The court also examined whether the applicant had a sufficient connection to the company to be able to seek reinstatement.

The court found that the deregistration was unjust because the applicant had a sufficient connection to the company and the rights of the members, particularly the superannuation members, would be prejudiced if the company was not reinstated. The court was satisfied that the applicant had established that the company should be reinstated in the interests of justice. The court also found that the public interest would be served by reinstating the company as it would preserve the rights of the members. Accordingly, the court ordered that the registration of the company be reinstated.

The court made an order pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035). The court also ordered that the costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause. The orders were made under Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission reinstate the registration of Leighton Superannuation Pty Limited (ACN 001 002 035).

2. Costs of the interlocutory application filed on 13 August 2020 be costs in the cause.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.