KREBS
v
VITASOVIC & ANOR
[2022] HCASL 206
P29/2022
The application for special leave to appeal from an order made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Mitchell JA) does not identify a point of principle of general importance appropriate for the grant of special leave to appeal. It concerns a matter of practice and procedure. It would not be in the interests of the administration of justice generally or in the particular circumstances of this case to grant special leave. Special leave to appeal is refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M Gordon S.H.P Steward 8 December 2022
- AGLC
- Krebs v Vitasovic & Anor [2022] HCASL 206
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 206
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the High Court was whether the appeal presented a point of principle of general importance, which would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. The High Court was tasked with determining if the case at hand held sufficient broader significance to merit review or if it was a matter confined to the specific circumstances of the parties involved.
The High Court found that the case did not identify a point of principle of general importance. The issues presented were considered to be matters of practice and procedure, lacking the broader implications necessary for special leave to appeal. Additionally, the Court concluded that granting special leave would not serve the interests of the administration of justice either generally or in the particular circumstances of this case. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused. Pursuant to the High Court Rules, the Registrar was directed to prepare, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.