Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kramer v Stone (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 298 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 11 December 2023 Decision date: 11 December 2023 Before: Ward P; Leeming JA; Kirk JA Decision: 1. The application for a special costs order is dismissed, with no order as to the costs of that application.
Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – appeals – where offer made before appeal hearing – whether the offer reflected genuine compromise – whether unreasonable for appellants not to accept the offer
Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.15A
Cases Cited: Abdi v Abdi (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 582
DSHE Holdings (Receivers & Managers appointed) (in liq) v Nicholas Abboud (No 4); National Australia Bank Ltd v Nicholas Abboud (No 5) [2022] NSWSC 91
Kramer v Stone [2023] NSWCA 270
Leach v Nominal Defendant (QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd) (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 391
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341
Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (New South Wales Branch) (No 2) (2014) 88 NSWLR 471; [2014] NSWIC 3
Taheri v Vitek (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 344
Category: Costs Parties: Hilary Lorraine Kramer (First Appellant)
Jaime Ferrer (Second Appellant)
David Lindsay Stone (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
R Wilson SC with M McGirr (Appellants)
L Ellison SC with H Bennett (Respondent)
Walker & White (Appellants)
Lane Associates (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/84277 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 16 February 2023
- Before:
- Robb J
- File Number(s):
- 2017/00261027
Judgment
-
THE COURT: On 10 November 2023, this Court delivered judgment dismissing a notice of motion filed on 24 July 2023 by the appellants for leave, if leave be necessary, to adduce additional evidence and dismissing, with costs, the appeal itself (Kramer v Stone [2023] NSWCA 270 (the principal judgment)).
-
The dispute between the parties concerned the ownership of a farming property at Upper Colo, New South Wales. The outcome of the proceedings was that an order was made that the said property was held on constructive trust for the respondent. That outcome was not disturbed on appeal. What now falls to be determined is an application by the respondent for a special costs order (costs on an indemnity basis on and after 3 August 2023) having regard to an offer made to compromise the appeal proceedings, which was rejected by the appellants. The application, which has been dealt with on the papers, is dismissed for the following reasons. In what follows, which assumes familiarity with the principal judgment, we adopt the definitions used in the principal judgment.
Offer
-
The special costs order is sought having regard to the non-acceptance by the appellants of an offer made by the respondent to settle the appeal by way of a formal offer of compromise served on 2 August 2023. The notice of appeal had been…
Continue reading Kramer v Stone (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kramer v Stone (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 298
- Case
- [2023] NSWCA 298
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether a costs order should be made against the appellants, specifically a special costs order, in circumstances where an offer of compromise had been made prior to the appeal hearing. The court was required to determine if this offer reflected a genuine compromise and, consequently, whether it was unreasonable for the appellants to have rejected it.
The court dismissed the application for a special costs order. The reasoning for this decision is not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the court found no basis to depart from the usual costs principles or to impose a special costs order on the appellants in relation to the offer made.
Consequently, the application for a special costs order was dismissed, and no order was made as to the costs of that specific application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for a special costs order is dismissed, with no order as to the costs of that application.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.