Kousal v Tack
[2005] HCATrans 50
[2005] HCATrans 050
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Melbourne No M283 of 2003
B e t w e e n -
ING ZDENEK GEORGE KOUSAL
Applicant
and
FRANCES TACK
Respondent
Application for special leave to appeal
GUMMOW J
HAYNE J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT MELBOURNE ON FRIDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2005, AT 12.20 PM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
MR I.Z.G. KOUSAL appeared in person.
GUMMOW J: In this matter the Court holds a certificate from the Deputy Registrar that she has been informed by Tolhurst Druce & Emmerson, solicitors for the respondent, that the respondent does not intend to participate in these proceedings at this stage but reserves her right to participate at a later stage should this special leave application be successful. Mr Kousal, we understand you wish us to proceed on the written papers that we have looked at?
MR KOUSAL: Yes, your Honour.
GUMMOW J: Thank you. Sit down, Mr Kousal.
This application for special leave to appeal from orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia is to be determined without oral argument. We have considered the written materials. The applicant does not demonstrate that the decision of the Full Court is attended by sufficient doubt to warrant the grant of special leave. Accordingly, special leave is refused.
AT 12.21 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Causation
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Reliance
0
0