King v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

King v GIO Australia Holdings Limited [2000] FCA 1869

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – form of opt out notice

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 33J, 33X, 33Y
Federal Court Rules, O 73 r 6

Femcare Ltd v Bright (2000) 100 FCR 331, referred to
King v GIO Holdings Ltd [2000] FCA 1543, considered
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chats House Investments Pty Ltd (1996) 71 FCR 250, referred to
Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [1999] 94 FCR 167, referred to

SHANE ROBERT KING v GIO AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LTD (ACN 054 573 401), GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED (ACN 050 036 372), DAVID MORTIMER, BRUCE HOGAN, STEWART STEFFEY, RONALD ASHTON, MARINA DARLING, ANDREW KALDOR, LLOYD LANGE, DAVID O’HALLARAN AND IAN POLLARD

N 955 OF 1999

MOORE J
20 DECEMBER 2000
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 955 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

SHANE ROBERT KING
APPLICANT

AND:

GIO AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS LIMITED
(ACN 054 573 401)
FIRST RESPONDENT

GRANT SAMUEL & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED
(ACN 050 036 372)
SECOND RESPONDENT

DAVID MORTIMER
THIRD RESPONDENT

BRUCE HOGAN
FOURTH RESPONDENT

STEWART STEFFEY
FIFTH RESPONDENT

RONALD ASHTON
SIXTH RESPONDENT

MARINA DARLING
SEVENTH RESPONDENT

ANDREW KALDOR
EIGHTH RESPONDENT

LLOYD LANGE
NINTH RESPONDENT

DAVID O’HALLARAN
TENTH RESPONDENT

IAN POLLARD
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

MOORE J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2000

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. pursuant to s 33J of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (“the Act”), 4pm on 23 February 2001 is fixed as the date by which a group member may opt out of these proceedings.

2. the form and content of the notice which is schedule 1 to these reasons (“the notice”) be approved for the purposes of s 33Y of the Act.

3.   the notice be sent by or on behalf of the applicant to all persons recorded as shareholders in the first respondent on the members register (“the register”) on 25 August 1998 who did not accept by 5 January 1999 the takeover offer by AMP Insurance Investment Holdings Pty Ltd.

4.   the notice be sent by ordinary post on or before 26 January 2001 to the address appearing on the register.

5.   a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim be available for inspection at each District Registry during Registry hours in the period 26 January 2001 to 23 February 2001 inclusive.

6.   leave be given to any person to whom the notice is sent (or his or her legal representative) to inspect a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim at a District Registry of the Court at the times and any of the places specified in the notice.

7.   a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim be posted on the Internet web site provided by the Federal Court of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read King v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2000] FCA 1869
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

King initiated legal proceedings against GIO Australia Holdings Ltd in the Federal Court of Australia. The dispute pertains to the implementation of the class action mechanism under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. King seeks to represent a class of shareholders in a derivative action against GIO Australia Holdings Ltd, and the court must decide on the procedural aspects of this action, including the opt-out notice to be sent to shareholders and the availability of documents for inspection.

The primary legal issues before the court were the form and content of the notice to be sent to shareholders, the timing and method of sending the notice, and the availability of the relevant legal documents for inspection. The court had to determine whether the notice met the requirements of the Act and whether the proposed methods of communicating the notice and making the documents available complied with the statutory provisions.

The court found that the notice, as proposed by King, was satisfactory and met the requirements of section 33Y of the Act. The court ordered that the notice be sent by ordinary post to all shareholders who had not accepted a takeover offer by a specified date. Additionally, the court directed that the notice and relevant documents be made available for inspection at District Registries and online. The court also ordered that an electronic copy of the relevant documents be emailed to the Federal Court. The court concluded that these measures would ensure that the shareholders were properly informed and could exercise their rights under the Act.

The court made several orders to facilitate the class action. The orders included setting a deadline for shareholders to opt out of the proceedings, approving the form and content of the notice to be sent to shareholders, and directing the method and timing of sending the notice and making the relevant documents available. The court also granted leave for shareholders and their representatives to inspect the documents at specified locations and times.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. pursuant to s 33J of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (“the Act”), 4pm on 23 February 2001 is fixed as the date by which a group member may opt out of these proceedings.

2. the form and content of the notice which is schedule 1 to these reasons (“the notice”) be approved for the purposes of s 33Y of the Act.

3. the notice be sent by or on behalf of the applicant to all persons recorded as shareholders in the first respondent on the members register (“the register”) on 25 August 1998 who did not accept by 5 January 1999 the takeover offer by AMP Insurance Investment Holdings Pty Ltd.

4. the notice be sent by ordinary post on or before 26 January 2001 to the address appearing on the register.

5. a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim be available for inspection at each District Registry during Registry hours in the period 26 January 2001 to 23 February 2001 inclusive.

6. leave be given to any person to whom the notice is sent (or his or her legal representative) to inspect a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim at a District Registry of the Court at the times and any of the places specified in the notice.

7. a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim be posted on the Internet web site provided by the Federal Court of Australia on or before 26 January 2001.

8. the applicant e-mail to query@fedcourt.gov.au a copy of the fourth further amended application and fourth further amended statement of claim (except the signature or other handwritten notations) in Rich Text Format (RTF) seven days before the notice is sent out in accordance with Order 4.

9. all parties to have liberty to apply exercisable within 24 hours of the making of these orders.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

MOORE J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: MOORE J

Full text does not contain this section.