Khalif v Mullarvey

Case [2022] VMC 18

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Khalif v Mullarvey [2022] VMC 18

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Arsalan v Rixon [2021] HCA 40
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…the ‘inconvenience of not having access to his car’ or deprivation of the ‘convenience and pleasure’ of its use.[24] [24] Arsalan v Rixon [2021] HCA 40, 22–23.…
Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 313
Citation 2

…[56] Karacominakis v Big Country Developments Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 313.…
Haines v Bendall [1991] HCA 15
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…plaintiff cannot recover more than they have lost. [29] [28] Butler v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (1966) 114 CLR 185, 191. [29] Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60, 63.…
Butler v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board [1966] HCA 38
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…] Cognate with this concept is the rule that a plaintiff cannot recover more than they have lost. [29] [28] Butler v Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (1966) 114 CLR 185, 191. [29] Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60, 63.…
Fallon v Johnston [2018] VSC 273
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…an innocent plaintiff should obtain a replacement vehicle in mitigation was considered in Fallon v Johnston ( Fallon ) . [54] [54] Fallon v Johnston [2018] VSC 273 ( Fallon ).…

AI Chat coming soon