CITATION: Kessey v Golledge [1999] NSWCA 424 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40261/98 HEARING DATE(S): 02/11/99 JUDGMENT DATE:
26 November 1999PARTIES :
Robin Joseph Kessey - Appellant
Kathryn Joy Golledge - RespondentJUDGMENT OF: Sheller JA at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Rolfe J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 5406/97; 13693/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sinclair DCJ, Dowd J, Master Greenwood
COUNSEL: Mr J. Poulos QC/Mr D.L. Ronzani - Appellant
Mr B.F. Murray QC/Mr J.P. Sewell - RespondentSOLICITORS: Dunhill Madden Butler - Appellant
Owen Hodge & Son - RespondentCATCHWORDS: Appeal from Interlocutory Orders; Appeals against Master's decision extending time to bring proceedings under Motor Accidents Act 1988 and against single Judge's decision dismissing that appeal dismissed.; Appeal From Trial Judge's Assessment of Damages; (a) Consideration of novus actus interveniens; (b) Amount to be deducted conformably with principle in Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham; (c) Generally parties should be held on appeal to the way in which the case was conducted at first instance. ACTS CITED: Motor Accidents Act 1988
Supreme Court Act 1970
Workers Compensation Act 1987CASES CITED: Ramton v Cassin (1995) 38 NSWLR 88; (1996) 70 ALJR 558
Salido v The Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524
Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541
Oldfields Pty Limited v Alfar (1996) 70 ALJR 560
McKew v Holland & Hannon & Cubitts (Scotland) Limited [1969] 3 All ER 1621
Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492
Multicon Engineering Pty Limited v Federal Airports Corporation (Court of Appeal, 26 August 1997, unreported)
The State of Queensland & Anor v J.L. Holdings Pty Limited (1997) 189 CLR 146
Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158
Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164
Franklins Self Serve Pty Limited v Wyber (1999) NSWCA 390
Suttor v Gundowda Pty Limited (1950) 81 CLR 418
Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1DECISION: (a) Appeal from decision of Master Greenwood dismissed.; (b) Appeal from the decision of Dowd J dismissed.; (c) Appeal from decision of Sinclair DCJ upheld in part.; (d) In lieu of judgment for the respondent in the sum of $412,046 there be judgment for the respondent in the sum of $345,074.25.; (e) The appellant pay the respondent's costs of each appeal.
THE SUPREME COURT
CA 40261 of 1998
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CLD 13693 of 1996
DC 5406 of 1997
BEAZLEY JA
SHELLER JA
ROLFE AJA
FRIDAY, 26 NOVEMBER 1999
KESSEY v GOLLEDGE
The plaintiff/respondent was involved in a motor vehicle accident in July 1992 as a result of the defendant/appellant’s admitted negligence. This aggravated and exacerbated an existing but essentially symptom free condition of spondylolisthesis, which necessitated a lumbar fusion in late 1992 and a revision of that operation in March 1994. The appellant did not contend that these procedures were not causally related to the accident.
The respondent failed to bring proceedings within the three year time limitation provided by the Motor Accidents…
Continue reading Kessey v Golledge
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kessey v Golledge [1999] NSWCA 424
- Case
- [1999] NSWCA 424
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine several legal issues. These included whether the Master erred in extending time for the respondent to bring proceedings under the *Motor Accidents Act 1988*. The court also had to consider whether the trial judge erred in their assessment of damages, specifically in relation to the application of the principle of *novus actus interveniens* and the amount to be deducted in accordance with the principle established in *Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham*. Finally, the court considered the general principle that parties should be held on appeal to the way in which the case was conducted at first instance.
The court dismissed the appeal against the Master's decision to extend time and the appeal against the single judge's dismissal of that appeal. However, the appeal against the trial judge's assessment of damages was upheld in part. The court reasoned that while the initial assessment of damages was flawed, particularly concerning the deductions, the parties should generally be held to the conduct of the case at first instance. Consequently, the judgment for the respondent was varied from $412,046 to $345,074.25. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of each appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(a) Appeal from decision of Master Greenwood dismissed.; (b) Appeal from the decision of Dowd J dismissed.; (c) Appeal from decision of Sinclair DCJ upheld in part.; (d) In lieu of judgment for the respondent in the sum of $412,046 there be judgment for the respondent in the sum of $345,074.25.; (e) The appellant pay the respondent's costs of each appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.