IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S55 of 1988 B e t w e e n -
ALICE MIRIAN KENNEDY
Applicant
and
S.H. LOCK (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Respondent
Application for special leave
to appeal
WILSON J
DAWSON J TOOHEY J
| Kennedy |
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 14 OCTOBER ·t988, AT Jl. 05 A."'1
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| SlT6/l/PLC | 1 | 14/10/88 |
| MR D.E.J. RYAN: | If it please the Court, I appear on behalf |
of the applicant. (instructed by R.B. Kandy & Company)
MR D.A. STAFF, QC: If the Court please, I appear with my
learned friend, MR S.M.P. REEVES, for the respondent.
(instructed by Phillips Fox)
| MR RYAN: | Your Honours, this morning the parties have reached |
a settlement in relation to this matter and my
instructions are to seek leave of the Court to have theapplication dismissed with no order as to costs.
WILSON J: Thank you, Mr Ryan. Mr Staff?
| MR STAFF: | We have no objection to that order, Your Honour. |
WILSON J: Very well. By consent, the application will be
refused with no order as to costs.
MR RYAN: If the Court pleases
AT 11.06 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| SlT6/2/PLC | 2 | 14/10/88 |
| Kennedy |
- AGLC
- Kennedy v SH Lock (Australia) Limited [1988] HCATrans 247
- Case
- [1988] HCATrans 247
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether to grant or refuse the application for special leave to appeal.
The parties informed the Court that they had reached a settlement in relation to the matter. Consequently, the applicant sought leave to have the application dismissed with no order as to costs. The respondent indicated no objection to this proposed order. The Court, by consent, refused the application for special leave to appeal with no order as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.