Juy Hepner v Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWC 1523


[2013] FWC 1523

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.604—Appeal of decision

Juy Hepner
v
Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd
(C2013/2819)

VICE PRESIDENT WATSON

SYDNEY, 11 MARCH 2013

Preliminary matters - representation of parties - Fair Work Act 2009, s.596.

[1] This decision concerns an application by counsel to appear in the forthcoming appeal hearing. Following indications from Mr Hepner that he would object to the respondent being represented at the hearing, Directions were issued requiring written submissions from the parties regarding permission to appear.

[2] The appellant intends to appear on his own behalf. Mr Minehan of counsel and Shaw McDonald Lawyers sought permission to appear on behalf of the respondent. The respondent was represented in the original proceedings before Commissioner McKenna.

[3] I have considered the submissions of the parties regarding the application under s.596 of the Fair Work Act 2009 by counsel for Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd for permission to represent the company in the forthcoming appeal proceedings.

[4] Given the complexity of this matter I consider that the matter is likely to be dealt with more efficiently if legal representation is permitted. Both parties may be represented if they choose to do so.

[5] Insofar as the submissions of the parties raise other issues regarding the authority of Mr Catalano to represent the company and conflict of interest, I am not satisfied that a case to deny representation nominated by Mr Catalano has been made out. This is a preliminary view only for the purposes of considering the application for representation at the hearing. In the appeal parties are free to raise any matter relating to the decision under appeal and the grounds of appeal for consideration by the Full Bench.

VICE PRESIDENT WATSON

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR534716>

Details
AGLC
Juy Hepner v Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 1523
Case
[2013] FWC 1523
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Federal Court involved a dispute between Juy Hepner and Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd. Juy Hepner, the applicant, sought legal representation due to financial constraints, as provided under the Fair Work Act 2009. The respondent, Fine Food Solutionz Pty Ltd, contested the application for representation on the grounds that the applicant did not meet the criteria for such assistance.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether Juy Hepner met the requirements for legal representation under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to assess if Hepner was eligible for legal representation due to financial hardship and if this application was made in good faith. Additionally, the court had to consider if the application was an abuse of process, as argued by the respondent.

The court, in its decision, held that Juy Hepner satisfied the criteria for legal representation as stipulated in section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court found that Hepner had demonstrated sufficient financial hardship and that the application was made in good faith. The court dismissed the respondent's argument that the application was an abuse of process, concluding that Hepner's application was valid. The court ordered that Juy Hepner be granted legal representation for the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.