Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick [2016] NSWCA 180 Hearing dates: 28 October 2015 Decision date: 29 July 2016 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [22]; Rothman J at [120] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed;
(2) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.Catchwords: TORTS – negligence – personal injury – respondent injured while working at premises occupied by appellant and at direction of appellant – respondent not employed by appellant – system of work not unsafe – failure by respondent to work in accordance with system as designed – failure of appellant to supervise implementation of system – breach of duty – whether primary judge failed to make findings of fact regarding appellant’s breach of duty – Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(6) – inadequacy of supervision – no formalised system of supervision
TORTS – negligence – causation – Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D – risk of harm to respondent from lifting bags of dextrose was foreseeable and not insignificant – harm could have been avoided through adequate supervision
TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – failure of primary judge to address plea of contributory negligence – power of Court of Appeal to determine plea of contributory negligence – Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; 72 NSWLR 728 – respondent not liable in contributory negligence
WORKERS COMPENSATION – joint tortfeasors – Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z(2) – whether s 151Z(2) applied – respondent’s employer not a joint tortfeasor – appellant not entitled to reduction under s 151Z(2)(c) – appeal against liability dismissed
DAMAGES – challenge to assessment of damages – cause of respondent’s ongoing symptoms – whether primary judge erred in finding that respondent’s injury constituted a serious aggravation of pre-existing degenerative condition in respondent’s lumbar spine – aggravation of pre-existing condition serious not temporary – appeal against damages dismissedLegislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D, 5R
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 75A(6), 75A(10)
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 151H, 151ZCases Cited: Forstaff Blacktown Pty Ltd v Brimac Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 423; Aust Torts Reports 81-814
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298
Maricic v Dalma Formwork (Australia) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 174
Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; 72 NSWLR 728
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; 59 ALR 529
Pollard v Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 99; Aust Torts Reports 81-949
Shoalhaven City Council v Humphries [2013] NSWCA 390Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jurox Pty Ltd (Appellant)
Sandra Bernadette Fullick (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J E Sexton SC/D P O’Dowd (Appellant)
C Hart/S McMahon (Respondent)
Kennedys Law (Appellant)
Bale Boshev Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2015/126713 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- District Court
- Date of Decision:
- 02 April 2015
- Before:
- Mahony DCJ
- File Number(s):
- 2013/281724
Judgment
-
LEEMING JA: I have had the advantage of reading…
Continue reading Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick [2016] NSWCA 180
- Case
- [2016] NSWCA 180
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether Jurox had breached its duty of care to Mr Fullick, whether any such breach caused Mr Fullick's injuries, and whether Mr Fullick was contributorily negligent. The court also considered whether Jurox was entitled to a reduction in liability under s 151Z(2) of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) and whether the assessment of damages was excessive.
The court found that while Jurox had not designed an unsafe system of work, it had failed to adequately supervise the implementation of that system. This failure to supervise, particularly in the absence of a formalised system, constituted a breach of duty. The court applied s 5D of the *Civil Liability Act 2002* (NSW) to find that the risk of harm from lifting bags was foreseeable and not insignificant, and that adequate supervision would have avoided the harm. The court also determined that Mr Fullick's employer was not a joint tortfeasor, thus s 151Z(2) of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) did not apply. Furthermore, the court found that the primary judge had not erred in assessing damages, concluding that the injury constituted a serious aggravation of a pre-existing degenerative condition.
The appeal was dismissed, and Jurox Pty Ltd was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Appeal dismissed;
(2) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.