Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick

Case [2016] NSWCA 180


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick [2016] NSWCA 180
Hearing dates:28 October 2015
Decision date: 29 July 2016
Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [22]; Rothman J at [120]
Decision:

(1)  Appeal dismissed;

 (2)  Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Catchwords:

TORTS – negligence – personal injury – respondent injured while working at premises occupied by appellant and at direction of appellant – respondent not employed by appellant – system of work not unsafe – failure by respondent to work in accordance with system as designed – failure of appellant to supervise implementation of system – breach of duty – whether primary judge failed to make findings of fact regarding appellant’s breach of duty – Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(6) – inadequacy of supervision – no formalised system of supervision

 

TORTS – negligence – causation – Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5D – risk of harm to respondent from lifting bags of dextrose was foreseeable and not insignificant – harm could have been avoided through adequate supervision

 

TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – failure of primary judge to address plea of contributory negligence – power of Court of Appeal to determine plea of contributory negligence – Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; 72 NSWLR 728 – respondent not liable in contributory negligence

 

WORKERS COMPENSATION – joint tortfeasors – Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z(2) – whether s 151Z(2) applied – respondent’s employer not a joint tortfeasor – appellant not entitled to reduction under s 151Z(2)(c) – appeal against liability dismissed

  DAMAGES – challenge to assessment of damages – cause of respondent’s ongoing symptoms – whether primary judge erred in finding that respondent’s injury constituted a serious aggravation of pre-existing degenerative condition in respondent’s lumbar spine – aggravation of pre-existing condition serious not temporary – appeal against damages dismissed
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5D, 5R
Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 75A(6), 75A(10)
Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 151H, 151Z
Cases Cited: Forstaff Blacktown Pty Ltd v Brimac Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 423; Aust Torts Reports 81-814
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; 101 CLR 298
Maricic v Dalma Formwork (Australia) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 174
Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; 72 NSWLR 728
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; 59 ALR 529
Pollard v Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 99; Aust Torts Reports 81-949
Shoalhaven City Council v Humphries [2013] NSWCA 390
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Jurox Pty Ltd (Appellant)
Sandra Bernadette Fullick (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
J E Sexton SC/D P O’Dowd (Appellant)
C Hart/S McMahon (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Kennedys Law (Appellant)
Bale Boshev Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):2015/126713
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court
Date of Decision:
02 April 2015
Before:
Mahony DCJ
File Number(s):
2013/281724

Judgment

  1. LEEMING JA: I have had the advantage of reading…

Continue reading Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Jurox Pty Ltd v Fullick [2016] NSWCA 180
Case
[2016] NSWCA 180
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal concerned a claim for personal injury brought by the respondent, Mr Mark Fullick, against Jurox Pty Ltd, the appellant. Mr Fullick sustained injuries while working at premises occupied by Jurox and at the direction of Jurox, although he was not employed by Jurox. The primary judge had found Jurox liable in negligence.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether Jurox had breached its duty of care to Mr Fullick, whether any such breach caused Mr Fullick's injuries, and whether Mr Fullick was contributorily negligent. The court also considered whether Jurox was entitled to a reduction in liability under s 151Z(2) of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) and whether the assessment of damages was excessive.

The court found that while Jurox had not designed an unsafe system of work, it had failed to adequately supervise the implementation of that system. This failure to supervise, particularly in the absence of a formalised system, constituted a breach of duty. The court applied s 5D of the *Civil Liability Act 2002* (NSW) to find that the risk of harm from lifting bags was foreseeable and not insignificant, and that adequate supervision would have avoided the harm. The court also determined that Mr Fullick's employer was not a joint tortfeasor, thus s 151Z(2) of the *Workers Compensation Act 1987* (NSW) did not apply. Furthermore, the court found that the primary judge had not erred in assessing damages, concluding that the injury constituted a serious aggravation of a pre-existing degenerative condition.

The appeal was dismissed, and Jurox Pty Ltd was ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Appeal dismissed;

(2) Appellant to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.