QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
JPR [2023] QCAT 82
PARTIES:
In an application about matters concerning JPR APPLICATION NO/S:
GAA1051-23
MATTER TYPE:
Guardianship and administration matters for adults
DELIVERED ON:
3 March 2023
HEARING DATE:
27 January 2023
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member Lember
ORDERS:
1. [K] is suspended as guardian for [JPR] for the following personal matters under s155 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000:
(a) Accommodation;
(b) With whom [JPR] has contact and/or visits;
(c) Health care;
(d) Provision of services;
(e) Day-to-day issues, including, for example, diet and dress;
(f) Legal matters not relating to [JPR]’s financial or property matters.
2. The Public Guardian are appointed jointly with [CW] as guardians for [JPR] for the following personal matters during the period of suspension:
(a) Accommodation;
(b) With whom [JPR] has contact and/or visits;
(c) Health care;
(d) Provision of services;
(e) Day-to-day issues, including, for example, diet and dress;
(f) Legal matters not relating to [JPR]’s financial or property matters.
3. The Tribunal directs the guardians to provide a written account of their actions as guardians to the Tribunal no later than three (3) working days prior to the hearing.
4. This guardianship appointment of the Public Guardian and [CW] remains current for three (3) months or, if the Tribunal makes a further order in this matter, until the date of the further order, whichever is the sooner.
CATCHWORDS:
HEALTH LAW – GUARDIANSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY OF PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED CAPACITY – ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – interim orders – where wife of adult appointed as joint guardian with son of adult – where wife risk feeding adult against medical advice and against wishes of joint guardian – where immediate risk of harm to adult from hyperglycaemia and choking due to risk feeding – where wife’s appointment as joint guardian suspended on an interim basis pending review hearing
Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) s 5, s 7, s 11, s 11B, s 11C, s 12, s 31, s 155, sch 4
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009
(Qld) s 32Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) s 13, s 48
Aziz v Prestige Property Services Pty Ltd [2007] QSC 265
BMR [2011] QCAT 280
CB [2013] QCAT 421
CJE [2014] QCAT 355
DAA [2009] QGAAT 8
GD [2011] QCAT 146
GKK [2011] QCAT 344
JSM [2011] QCAT 351
RRF [2016] QCAT 518
RP [2012] QCAT 253
SI [2012] QCAT 577
SN [2011] QCAT 362
SWB [2014] QCAT 134
TR [2012] QCAT 443
VJM [2012] QCAT 53WJP [2012] QCAT 714
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld).
REASONS FOR DECISION
What is the application about?
JPR is an eighty-one-year-old gentleman who suffered a severe brain injury in a motor vehicle accident in 2007 leading to his cognitive impairment, and who also now suffers from Type 2 diabetes, hypertension and various other physical…
Continue reading JPR
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- JPR [2023] QCAT 82
- Case
- [2023] QCAT 82
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The final orders made by the Tribunal were as follows: 1) K is suspended as guardian for JPR for the specified personal matters under s155 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000; 2) The Public Guardian is appointed jointly with CW as guardians for JPR for the specified personal matters during the period of suspension; 3) The guardians are directed to provide a written account of their actions to the Tribunal no later than three working days prior to the hearing; and 4) The guardianship appointment of the Public Guardian and CW remains current for three months or until a further order is made, whichever is sooner.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.