Jovcic v Coopers Brewery Limited

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Jovcic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2023] FCA 797  

Appeal from: Application for an extension of time: Jovcic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2023] FCA 423
File number: SAD 59 of 2023
Judgment of: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 13 July 2023
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — application to extend the time within which to appeal from final orders pursuant to r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) —– where length of delay is not significant —– whether explanation for the delay is satisfactory —– where no specific prejudice to the first respondent identified —– extension of time granted
Legislation:

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 400, 604

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 36.03, 36.05

Cases cited:

BQQ15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 218

Jackamarra v Krakouer [1998] HCA 27; (1998) 195 CLR 516

Division: Fair Work Division
Registry: South Australia
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 22
Date of last submissions: 19 June 2023 (Applicants)
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr S Ower KC with Mr S Lindsay
Solicitor for the Applicants: Sekhon Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr S McDonald SC
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Piper Alderman
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear

ORDERS

SAD 59 of 2023
BETWEEN:

JOVAN JOVCIC

First Applicant

FILIP MARKOVIC

Second Applicant

AND:

COOPERS BREWERY LIMITED

First Respondent

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

Second Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

BESANKO J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 JULY 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The applicants’ application for an extension of time within which to file a Notice of appeal in terms of the Draft Notice of appeal, which is exhibit “PSS-3” to the affidavit of Parambir Singh Sekhon affirmed on 22 May 2023, be granted and the time be extended to 20 July 2023.

2.The listing of this proceeding on 18 July 2023 be vacated.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BESANKO J:

  1. This is an application for an extension of time within which to appeal from orders made by a judge of this Court on 5 April 2023 (Jovcic v Coopers Brewery Limited [2023] FCA 423). Rule 36.03 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) provides as follows:

    An appellant must file a notice of appeal:

    (a)       within 28 days after:

    (i)the date on which the judgment appealed from was pronounced or the order was made; or

    (ii)       …

    (b)      on or before a date fixed for that purpose by the court appealed from.

  2. A party may apply for an extension of time within which to file a Notice of appeal under r 36.05.

  3. In this case, oral reasons were given and orders pronounced by the primary judge on 5 April 2023 and written reasons for judgment were published by her Honour on 5 May 2023.  The application for an extension of time was filed…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Jovcic v Coopers Brewery Limited and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] FCA 797
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the applicants, Jovcic, sought an extension of time to appeal final orders against the respondent, Coopers Brewery Limited. The applicants’ initial deadline to file a Notice of Appeal had passed, and they applied for an extension under rule 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. The primary issue before the court was whether the applicants had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and whether the delay was significant enough to warrant refusal of the extension. Additionally, the court considered whether the delay had caused any specific prejudice to the respondent.

The court found that the delay in this case was not significant, and the explanation provided by the applicants for the delay was satisfactory. The applicants’ legal representatives had acted promptly upon becoming aware of the need to file an appeal, and the delay was largely due to administrative errors. Furthermore, the court noted that no specific prejudice to the respondent had been identified as a result of the delay. Given these factors, the court was satisfied that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the extension of time. Consequently, the court granted the application and extended the time for the applicants to file a Notice of Appeal to 20 July 2023. The listing of the proceeding scheduled for 18 July 2023 was also vacated as a result.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The applicants’ application for an extension of time within which to file a Notice of appeal in terms of the Draft Notice of appeal, which is exhibit “PSS-3” to the affidavit of Parambir Singh Sekhon affirmed on 22 May 2023, be granted and the time be extended to 20 July 2023.

2. The listing of this proceeding on 18 July 2023 be vacated.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.