Jones v Hanssen Pty Ltd

Case [2008] FMCA 291


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

JONES v HANSSEN PTY LTD [2008] FMCA 291
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Penalty – breaches of civil penalty provisions – lodgement of unapproved AWA – failure to lodge approved AWA within time – failure to provide employees with ready access and information statement – consideration of factors relevant to penalty.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), ss.167(2)(a), 337, 341, 342, 407, 841

ACCC v ABB Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 559

ACCC v IPM Operations Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 11

ASC v Forem-Freeway Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ASCR 339Australian Ophthalmic Australian Ophthalmic Suppliers Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8
BHP Steele (AIS) Pty Ltd v CFMU [2000] FCA 1908

Carr v CEPU & Anor [2007] FMCA 1526
Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd (No 2.) [1999] FCA 1714
Commonwealth Bank of Australia & Anor v Finance Sector Union (2007) 157 FCR 329; [2007] FCAFC 18

Cotis v Pow Juice Pty Ltd [2007] FMCA 140
Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2005) 224 ALR 467; [2005] FCA 1847

Flattery v The Italian Eatery trading as Zeffirelli’s Pizza Restaurant [2007] FMCA 9
Jordan v Mornington Inn Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1384
Lawlor v Dartbridge Pty Ltd & Anor [2007] FMCA 2119
Lee v Hanssen Pty Ltd [2004] WAIRComm 10868
Leighton Contractors & Anor v CFMEU & Ors [2006] WASC 317
Mason v Harrington Corporation Pty Ltd [2007] FMCA 7

TWU v Glynburn Contractors (Salisbury) Pty Ltd (1991) 37 IR 313

WABLPPUW v Hanssen Pty Ltd (unreported, Industrial Magistrates Court of Western Australia, Cicchini IM, 2 March 2000)

Applicant: ANDREW MARK JONES
Respondent: HANSSEN PTY LTD
File Number: PEG 183 of 2007
Judgment of: Lucev FM
Hearing date: 5 November 2007
Date of Last Submission: 5 November 2007
Delivered at: Perth
Delivered on: 11 March 2008

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms G Archer
Solicitors for the Applicant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr THF Casperz
Solicitors for the Respondent: Jackson McDonald

ORDERS

  1. That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 341 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $11,550.00

  2. That in respect of the admitted contravention of section 342 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $750.00.

  3. That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 337(1) and (8) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $5,775.00.

  4. That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 337(2) and (9) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $5,775.00.

  5. Payment of the penalties be made within 28 days to Consolidated Revenue.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
PERTH

PEG 183 of 2007

ANDREW MARK JONES

Applicant

And

HANSSEN PTY LTD

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Application

  1. By application made on 12 September 2007 the Applicant, a workplace inspector appointed pursuant to s.167(2)(a) of the Workplace…

Continue reading Jones v Hanssen Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Jones v Hanssen Pty Ltd [2008] FMCA 291
Case
[2008] FMCA 291
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Jones v Hanssen Pty Ltd dealt with several contraventions of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) by the respondent, Hanssen Pty Ltd, in relation to their employment practices. The applicant, Jones, sought penalties for multiple breaches, and the proceedings took place in the Federal Circuit Court. The court had to determine the appropriate penalties for each contravention of the Act, which included sections 341, 342, 337(1) and (8), and 337(2) and (9).

The primary legal issue before the court was the quantification of penalties for the admitted contraventions of various sections of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). The court needed to consider the nature and seriousness of the contraventions, as well as the intent behind them, to decide the appropriate financial penalties. This involved assessing the harm caused by the contraventions and the respondent's level of culpability.

The court found that the respondent's actions were deliberate and caused significant harm to the employee, warranting substantial penalties. It meticulously evaluated each contravention, taking into account the statutory guidelines and the precedents set by previous cases. After careful deliberation, the court decided on specific penalties for each contravention, reflecting the gravity of the breaches and the need for deterrence.

In summary, the court ordered Hanssen Pty Ltd to pay various penalties for the contraventions of sections 341, 342, 337(1) and (8), and 337(2) and (9) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth). The penalties ranged from $750.00 to $11,550.00 per contravention, with a total payment due within 28 days to Consolidated Revenue.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 341 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $11,550.00

2.

That in respect of the admitted contravention of section 342 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $750.00.

3.

That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 337(1) and (8) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $5,775.00.

4.

That in respect of each of the admitted contraventions of section 337(2) and (9) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) the Respondent pay a penalty of $5,775.00.

5.

Payment of the penalties be made within 28 days to Consolidated Revenue.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.