Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Johnston v TAFE NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 152 Hearing dates: 15 March 2019 Date of orders: 01 August 2019 Decision date: 01 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed.
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – freedom of information – access to information – legal professional privilege – whether respondent holds further information – access charges – whether information personal information Legislation Cited: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Amos v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWCATAD 101
Battin v University of New England [2013] NSWADT 73
Camilleri v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2012] NSWADT 5
Cianfrano v Director General, Attorney General's Department [2008] NSWADTAP 10
Fenwick v Wambo Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 353
Miriani v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2005] NSWADT 187
Mizzi v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2013] NSWADT 150
Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 Saggers v Environment Protection Authority [2013] NSWADT 109
Shepherd and Department of Housing, Local Government and Planning (1994) 1 QAR 464
Tebbutt v Minister for Lands and Water [2015] NSWCATAD 95
Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244
Waterford v Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54
Watson v NSW Trustee and Guardian (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAD 19Category: Principal judgment Parties: Phillip Johnston (Applicant)
TAFE NSW (Respondent)Representation: P Johnston (Applicant in person)
Solicitors:
A Flechnoe-Brown (Respondent)
Clayton Utz (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/00204300 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to the material filed by the respondent on a confidential basis, to the evidence given in private before the Tribunal and to the record of that part of the proceedings conducted in private pursuant to s 49. That material is not to be released to either the applicant or to the public.
REASONS FOR DECISION
-
In early 2018 Mr Phillip Johnston, who had previously been an employee of TAFE NSW, sought to enrol in the Certificate IV in Business Administration at Northern Sydney Institute Meadowbank Campus. On 22 February 2018 he was informed that his enrolment could not be finalised and was directed not to attend classes until the status of his enrolment was resolved. That occurred on 27 April 2018 when he was informed by TAFE NSW that his enrolment would be accepted, subject to certain conditions being fulfilled including that he enter into a Student Behavioural Agreement on terms determined by TAFE NSW. As I understand it, Mr Johnston refused to enter into the agreement and did not enrol in the course.
-
Mr Johnston originally made an application to TAFE NSW under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act) on 9 April 2018 seeking access to a range of information concerning his attempt to enrol in the Business Administration course. This application was subsequently amended. Following communication with Mr Johnston, TAFE NSW formed the view that the application was in fact invalid…
Continue reading Johnston v TAFE NSW
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Johnston v TAFE NSW [2019] NSWCATAD 152
- Case
- [2019] NSWCATAD 152
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary issue for determination was whether the documents withheld by TAFE NSW were either privileged or personal information. A secondary issue was whether TAFE NSW held further information. The court also considered whether the charges imposed by TAFE NSW were excessive. The court found that TAFE NSW had not discharged the onus of establishing that the withheld documents were privileged or personal information. The court further found that TAFE NSW did not hold further information. The court held that the charges imposed by TAFE NSW were excessive.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.