Johnson v Sheppard

Case [2005] WASCA 13


JOHNSON -v- SHEPPARD [2005] WASCA 13



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2005] WASCA 13
THE FULL COURT (WA)
Case No:FUL:84/200323 AUGUST 2004
Coram:MURRAY J
TEMPLEMAN J
SIMMONDS J
4/02/05
15Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Appeal dismissed
B
PDF Version
Parties:CORINA JOHNSON
ROBERT SHEPPARD

Catchwords:

Administrative law
Appeal against decision of District Court on appeal from Real Estate and Business Agents Supervisory Board
Licensed real estate agent
Contract for sale of strata title units
Whether conduct of agent involved breach of code of conduct for agents and sales representatives
Duty to act fairly and honestly

Legislation:

Code of Conduct for Agents and Sales Representatives, s 5(1)
Real Estate and Business Agents Act 1978 (WA)

Case References:

Grljusich v Andrews [2003] WASCA 206
Harle v Legal Practitioners Liability Committee [2003] VSCA 133
Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230
Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493

Bradshaw v Medical Board (WA) [1990] 3 WAR 322
Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336
Chidiac v The Queen (1991) 171 CLR 432
Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194
Maxwell v Dixon [1965] WAR 167
Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493
State Rail Authority of NSW v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors (1999) 160 ALR 588
Warwick Entertainment Centre Pty Ltd v McKenzie [2000] WASCA 280
Ziems v Prothonotary of The Supreme Court of NSW (1957) 97 CLR 279

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : THE FULL COURT (WA) CITATION : JOHNSON -v- SHEPPARD [2005] WASCA 13 CORAM : MURRAY J
    TEMPLEMAN J
    SIMMONDS J
HEARD : 23 AUGUST 2004 DELIVERED : 4 FEBRUARY 2005 FILE NO/S : FUL 84 of 2003 BETWEEN : CORINA JOHNSON
    Appellant

    AND

    ROBERT SHEPPARD
    Respondent


ON APPEAL FROM:

Jurisdiction : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Coram : YEATS DCJ

Citation : JOHNSON -v- SHEPPARD [2003] WADC 112

File No : APP 111 of 2002





Catchwords:

Administrative law - Appeal against decision of District Court on appeal from Real Estate and Business Agents Supervisory Board - Licensed real estate agent - Contract for sale of strata title units - Whether conduct of agent involved




(Page 2)

breach of code of conduct for agents and sales representatives - Duty to act fairly and honestly


Legislation:

Code of Conduct for Agents and Sales Representatives, s 5(1)


Real Estate and Business Agents Act 1978 (WA)


Result:

Appeal dismissed




Category: B


Representation:


Counsel:


    Appellant : Mr J C Curthoys
    Respondent : Mr S W O'Sullivan


Solicitors:

    Appellant : Stables Scott
    Respondent : Tottle Christensen



Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Grljusich v Andrews [2003] WASCA 206
Harle v Legal Practitioners Liability Committee [2003] VSCA 133
Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230
Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493

Case(s) also cited:



Bradshaw v Medical Board (WA) [1990] 3 WAR 322
Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938)

Continue reading Johnson v Sheppard

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Johnson v Sheppard [2005] WASCA 13
Case
[2005] WASCA 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Johnson v Sheppard involved the appellant, a licensed real estate agent, who sought to appeal against the decision of the District Court, which had upheld an earlier ruling by the Real Estate and Business Agents Supervisory Board. The dispute centred on the agent's conduct in relation to a contract for the sale of strata title units. The central issue was whether the agent's conduct amounted to a breach of the code of conduct for agents and sales representatives, specifically the duty to act fairly and honestly.

The legal issues the court needed to determine were whether the agent's actions warranted a finding of misconduct under the Real Estate and Business Agents Act 1980, and if so, whether the penalty imposed was appropriate. The court had to consider the evidence presented and whether the agent had breached the code by failing to act fairly and honestly in the transaction. Additionally, the court needed to evaluate whether the penalty of a six-month suspension of the agent's licence was proportionate to the alleged misconduct.

In its reasoning, the court found that the evidence did not support the agent's claim that they were not involved in the sale of the strata title units. The agent had failed to act fairly and honestly by not disclosing certain information to the purchaser, which was a clear breach of the code of conduct. The court held that the penalty imposed by the Supervisory Board was appropriate given the nature and seriousness of the misconduct. The appeal was dismissed, and the penalty upheld, as the court found that the agent's actions warranted disciplinary action.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.