Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2006]AATA 464
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2005/485
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION ) Re JOHN TAYLOR Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly and Member, Dr John Campbell Date26 May 2006
PlaceSydney
Decision The decision under review is set aside and in substitution the decision is made that Mr Taylor is entitled to the special rate of pension.
[sgd] Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly
Presiding Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ APPEALS – increase in pension rate – Applicant seeking to be paid the special rate of pension – seven accepted disabilities including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder with secondary alcohol abuse and depression – medical evidence supports that due to Applicant’s psychiatric conditions he is unable to work for 8 hours a week – Applicant’s remunerative work was manual labouring – Applicant’s war caused psychiatric conditions alone prevent him from undertaking and continue to prevent him undertaking remunerative work – decision set aside
LEGISLATION
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 ss 24, 120(4)CASELAW
Flentjar v Repatriation Commission (1997) 48 ALD 1
Starcevich v Repatriation Commission (1987) 76 AAR 449
Fry v Repatriation Commission (1997) 47 ALD 776
Magill v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 744REASONS FOR DECISION
26 May 2006 Senior Member, Mrs Josephine Kelly and
Member, Dr John CampbellIntroduction
1. Mr Taylor is a Vietnam veteran. He is seeking a review of the assessment of his pension. It is currently assessed at 100% of the general rate. He wishes to be paid the special rate of pension. Mr Taylor was born on 20 July 1946 and is currently 59 years of age.
2. The decision under review is the decision of the Repatriation Commission (“the Commission”) dated 20 November 2003 that assessed disability pension at 100% of the General Rate, and which was affirmed by the Veterans’ Review Board on 22 February 2005.
3. The “assessment period” commenced on 24 October 2003, the date Mr Taylor made a claim for pension, which is the ‘application day’.
Mr Taylor’s Accepted Disabilities
4. Following is a list of Mr Taylor’s accepted disabilities and the dates of acceptance according to the Commission’s records:
· Gun shot wound right shoulder (date unknown)
· Perceptive deafness (date unknown)
· Anxiety state (dated unknown)
· Osteoarthrosis of the right shoulder (13 September 2000)
· Post traumatic stress disorder with secondary alcohol abuse and depression (24 July 2003)
· Diabetes mellitus (6 August 2003)
· Hypertension (6 August 2003)
5. It is not contested that the “gun shot wound” was in fact a mortar injury which Mr Taylor suffered during the Tet offensive while asleep in a shellscape when he was guarding American artillery. One of his mates was killed. He was taken by helicopter to an American base hospital where some of the shrapnel was removed. Following convalescence he went back into the field for about three weeks but had difficulty carrying his pack, and was returned to hospital. Further shrapnel was removed…
Continue reading JOHN TAYLOR and REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- JOHN TAYLOR and REPATRIATION COMMISSION [[2006]] AATA 464
- Case
- [2006] AATA 464
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether Taylor’s psychiatric conditions alone justified a classification for the special rate of pension. The court needed to determine if Taylor’s conditions were severe enough to prevent him from undertaking any remunerative work, considering his previous employment as manual labouring. The court also had to consider the medical evidence presented regarding Taylor's inability to work due to his psychiatric conditions.
The court found that Taylor’s war-caused psychiatric conditions significantly impaired his ability to undertake any form of remunerative work. The medical evidence was compelling, indicating that Taylor was unable to work even part-time due to his conditions. The court held that these conditions alone justified the classification for the special rate of pension, as they were sufficient to prevent him from engaging in any employment. Consequently, the decision to deny Taylor the special rate of pension was set aside, and it was determined that Taylor is entitled to the special rate of pension.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is set aside and in substitution the decision is made that Mr Taylor is entitled to the special rate of pension.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.