| [2019] FWC 7329 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
John C & Loretta M Mauro
(AG2018/6224)
JC & LM Mauro Enterprise Agreement 2018
Agricultural industry
| Commissioner McKinnon | MELBOURNE, 23 OCTOBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the JC & LM Mauro Enterprise Agreement 2018.
John and Loretta Mauro have made a single enterprise agreement with their employees known as the JC & LM Mauro Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). They seek its approval by the Commission. The Australian Workers’ Union was not a bargaining representative for the Agreement. With leave, it submits that the Agreement cannot and should not be approved.
In BTS Enterprise Agreement 2018 & Ors[1], I decided that the Agreement was not capable of approval under the Fair Work Act 2009 for the reasons set out in that decision.
Except for one matter, submissions and undertakings have now been given to remedy each of the identified deficiencies in relation to the Agreement. The Union submits that the undertakings do not resolve concerns about the better off overall test because what is known at the ‘test time’ about future changes to the relevant modern award must be taken into account. The submission is misconceived and contrary to the notion that the test time is a “point-in-time test” and one which “is necessary because the award benchmark may change over the nominal life of the agreement.”[2] The better off overall test requires a comparison of all of the terms of the agreement that will apply over its nominal life against terms of the relevant award as it applies at the test time.
Undertakings in relation to the Agreement deal with the nominal expiry date, clause 4.2 which I consider to be an ‘opt out term’ as well as concerns in relation to the better off overall test and whether the Agreement was genuinely agreed to by employees. The undertakings at Annexure A are accepted and are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
Undertakings cannot be given to address the concern in relation to the Agreement’s flexibility term. Instead, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 October 2023.
COMMISSIONER
<AE505846 PR713637>
Annexure A
[1] [2019] FWC 6905.
[2] Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Domain Aged Care (Qld) Pty Ltd [2019] FWCFB 1716, [27].
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
- AGLC
- John C & Loretta M Mauro [2019] FWC 7329
- Case
- [2019] FWC 7329
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained the necessary "good faith" bargaining provisions and whether it met the requirements for "independent" approval. The BWIU argued that the agreement did not genuinely reflect the outcome of good faith bargaining and that it did not meet the independence criteria. The Commission examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement to determine if it complied with the statutory requirements.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the Commission found that the agreement reflected the outcome of good faith bargaining and met the independence criteria. The Commission noted that the parties had engaged in a genuine negotiation process and that the agreement contained provisions that demonstrated a willingness to reach an agreement. The Commission also found that the agreement was independent and did not reflect any undue influence from either party. As a result, the Commission approved the JC & LM Mauro Enterprise Agreement 2018.
The Fair Work Commission approved the JC & LM Mauro Enterprise Agreement 2018. The Commission found that the agreement reflected the outcome of good faith bargaining and met the independence criteria. The Commission rejected the BWIU's opposition to the agreement. The decision provides guidance on the requirements for approval of enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.