JM v PB

Case [2007] QDC 140


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

JM v PB [2007] QDC 140

PARTIES:

JM (Applicant)

V

PB (Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

BD1261/07

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Criminal Compensation Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

4 July 2007

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

24 May 2007

JUDGE:

Tutt DCJ

ORDER:

The respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,000.00 by way of compensation for the injury suffered by her as a result of the offences of which the respondent was convicted and sentenced by this court on 26 April 2005;1.    

The respondent pay the applicant her costs of and incidental to this application to be agreed or assessed on the standard basis under the District Court scale where the amount recovered is less than $50,000.00.2.    

CATCHWORDS:

CRIMINAL COMPENSATION CLAIM PURSUANT TO s 663B of the Criminal Code – Mental or nervous shock – prescribed amount – causation – whether contributing factors.

Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) ss 663AA, 663B(2)

Criminal Offences Victims Act 1995 (Qld) s 46(2)

McClintock v Jones [1995] 79A Crim R 238

SAM v SAM [2001] QCA 12

LMW v Nicholls (2004) QDC 118

SAY v AZ: ex parte AG (Qld) [2006] QCA 462

SOLICITORS:

Ms F. Muirhead of LAQ for the applicant

No appearance for the respondent

Introduction:

  1. The applicant JM claims compensation for injury sustained by her as a result of two criminal offences of a sexual nature committed against her by the respondent to the application PB.

  1. The respondent was convicted by this court at Beenleigh on 26 April 2005 of two counts of unlawfully and indecently dealing with the applicant who was a child under 16 years, then under 12 years, between 1 March 1993 and 1 May 1993 at Brisbane when the applicant was aged 9 years.

  1. This application is made on the basis of a “mental or nervous shock” disorder assessed by Dr Barbara Anne McGuire, psychiatrist, in her report of 11 January 2007 and supplementary report of 15 February 2007, which are Exhibit A to her affidavit filed 3 May 2007.  There are no physical injuries to the applicant which form the basis for any claim for compensation before the court.

  1. In addition to the affidavit of the said Barbara Ann McGuire, this application is supported by the following material:

(a)       The affidavit with exhibits of the applicant JM sworn 25 April 2007 and filed in this court on 3 May 2007;

(b)      The affidavits with exhibits of Lorraine Penshorn, litigation support officer, sworn 18 April 2007, and 22 May 2007 respectively and filed in this court on 3 May 2007 and by leave on 24 May 2007 respectively.

Relevant legislation:

  1. As the offences occurred prior to 18 December 1995, Chapter 65A of the Criminal Code (“the Code”) applies, as if not repealed.[1] 

    [1] Section 46(2) Criminal Offences Victims Act 1995.

  1. In assessing the appropriate sum for compensation to which the applicant may be entitled it is necessary to consider the relevant “prescribed amount” which applied at the time when…

Continue reading JM v PB

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
JM v PB [2007] QDC 140
Case
[2007] QDC 140
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of JM v PB involved a claim for criminal compensation pursuant to section 663B of the Criminal Code. JM, the applicant, sought compensation from PB, the respondent, who was convicted and sentenced by the court on 26 April 2005. The dispute centred on the applicant’s claim for mental or nervous shock and the prescribed amount of compensation, considering various contributing factors.

The court was required to determine whether the applicant was entitled to compensation for the mental or nervous shock she experienced as a result of the offences committed by PB. A key issue was the extent to which the applicant's pre-existing conditions contributed to her claimed mental state, and whether these conditions were a significant factor in the causation of her distress. Additionally, the court had to decide on the appropriate amount of compensation, considering the statutory prescribed amounts and any mitigating or aggravating factors.

In its decision, the court found that the applicant was indeed entitled to compensation for the injury she suffered due to PB's criminal actions. The court acknowledged the applicant’s experience of mental or nervous shock and determined that the prescribed amount of compensation was applicable. The court also considered the contributing factors, including the applicant's pre-existing conditions, and concluded that these did not preclude her from receiving compensation. Ultimately, the court awarded the applicant $15,000.00 in compensation and ordered PB to pay the applicant’s costs of and incidental to this application.

Orders

Orders of the court

The respondent pay the applicant the sum of $15,000.00 by way of compensation for the injury suffered by her as a result of the offences of which the respondent was convicted and sentenced by this court on 26 April 2005;1.

The respondent pay the applicant her costs of and incidental to this application to be agreed or assessed on the standard basis under the District Court scale where the amount recovered is less than $50,000.00.2.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.