Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2012] NSWCA 339 Hearing dates: 15 June and 11 October 2012 Decision date: 11 October 2012 Before: Allsop P at [1], [43]
Macfarlan JA at [42]Decision: As to the summons dated 15 February 2012 and filed 16 February 2012:
1. Extend time for the filing and service of the summons to a date conformable with compliance with the Rules.
2. Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
3. Summons dismissed.
4. Applicant pay the costs of the respondents.
As to the summons dated 9 July 2012 in respect of the decision of the Land and Environment Court of 23 November 2011:
1. Application for an extension of time in which to file and serve the summons for leave to appeal refused.
2. Summons otherwise dismissed with costs.
As to the summons dated 9 July 2012 in respect of the decision of the Land and Environment Court dated 30 November 2011:
1. Application for an extension of time in which to file and serve the summons for leave to appeal refused.
2. Summons otherwise dismissed with costs.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for extension of time for leave to appeal - no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-60
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.16(1) and 36.16(2)(b)Cases Cited: Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 367 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ivan Jeray (Applicant)
Blue Mountains City Council (First Respondent)
Greg Egan (Second Respondent)
John Egan (Third Respondent)Representation: In person (Applicant)
I J Hemmings (First Respondent)
P R Clay SC (Second and Third Respondents)
In person (Applicant)
Marsdens Law Group (First Respondent)
Crennan Legal (Second and Third Respondents)
File Number(s): 2012/53739 2012/191516 2012/225118 Decision under appeal
- Citation:
- [2011] NSWLEC 218
[2011] NSWLEC 228- Before:
- Moore AJ
- File Number(s):
- 2008/40986
2010/40517
Judgment
ALLSOP P: On 10 December 2010 this Court (Macfarlan JA and myself, Young JA dissenting) allowed an appeal of Mr Jeray from orders made by a judge of the Land and Environment Court on 16 July 2009 dismissing proceedings in that Court. The matter was remitted to the Land and Environment Court: see Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 367. Mr Jeray and the Council were participating in the fourth day of a scheduled ten day hearing. The events that led to the dismissal are set out at [2010] NSWCA 367 at [13]-[23]. Briefly, and without attempting to be complete, Mr Jeray refused to proceed…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] NSWCA 339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether to grant an extension of time for Jeray to file and serve the summons for leave to appeal, and subsequently, whether to grant leave to appeal itself. The Court was also required to consider the appropriate orders regarding costs.
The Court of Appeal noted that the applications for extension of time were made significantly out of time, and that there was no question of principle raised by the proposed appeals. Given the lack of any compelling reason to depart from the usual time limits and the absence of a significant legal issue, the Court refused the applications for extensions of time. Consequently, the summonses for leave to appeal were dismissed. Jeray was ordered to pay the costs of the respondents.
Orders
Orders of the court
As to the summons dated 15 February 2012 and filed 16 February 2012:
1. Extend time for the filing and service of the summons to a date conformable with compliance with the Rules.
2. Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
3. Summons dismissed.
4. Applicant pay the costs of the respondents.
As to the summons dated 9 July 2012 in respect of the decision of the Land and Environment Court of 23 November 2011:
1. Application for an extension of time in which to file and serve the summons for leave to appeal refused.
2. Summons otherwise dismissed with costs.
As to the summons dated 9 July 2012 in respect of the decision of the Land and Environment Court dated 30 November 2011:
1. Application for an extension of time in which to file and serve the summons for leave to appeal refused.
2. Summons otherwise dismissed with costs.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.