FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jenkins v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 269
JOAN ELEANOR JENKINS v THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION
N 28 OF 1999HELY J
22 MARCH 1999
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 28 OF 1999
BETWEEN:
JOAN ELEANOR JENKINS
ApplicantAND:
THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RespondentJUDGE:
HELY J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 MARCH 1999
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
2. No order as to costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 28 OF 1999
BETWEEN:
JOAN ELEANOR JENKINS
ApplicantAND:
THE REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE:
HELY J
DATE:
22 MARCH 1999
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This appeal is brought pursuant to s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975. The issue is whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Veterans Appeals Division (“AAT”), made an error of law in concluding that the applicant is not a dependant of the late Alan Milton Jenkins (“the veteran”) within the meaning of the relevant provisions of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (“the Act”). In coming to that conclusion, AAT affirmed the decision of the Repatriation Commission, which had itself been affirmed by the Veterans’ Review Board.
The Legislative Scheme
The Commonwealth is liable to pay pensions to dependants of veterans whose deaths are war-caused: Act, s 13(1). Whether the veteran’s death was war-caused has not been the subject of determination. The only issue before AAT was that of dependency. This issue was raised as a preliminary question.
The definition of dependant in s 11 of the Act relevantly includes the partner (s 11(1)(a)) or widow (s 11(1)(c)) of the veteran. The applicant was not legally married to the veteran at the time of the veteran’s death. Thus the relevant part of the s 5E(1) definition of widow is:
“(a) a woman who was the partner of a man immediately before he died.”
Partner is defined in s 5E(1) as the other member of a couple.
Member of a couple is defined in s 5E(2). The relevant part of the subsection for present purposes is s 5E(2)(b) which provides that a person is a member of a couple if:
“all of the following conditions are met:
(i)the person is living with a person of the opposite sex (in this paragraph called the partner);
(ii)the person is not legally married to the partner;
(iii)the person and the partner are, in the Commission’s opinion (formed as mentioned in s 11A), in a marriage-like relationship;
(iv)the person and the partner are not within a prohibited relationship for the purposes of s 23B of the Marriage Act 1961.
Living with is qualified by s 5E(3):
“For the purposes of subparagraph (2)(b)(i), a person is to be treated as living with another person during:
(a)any temporary absence of one of those persons,
(b)an…
Continue reading Jenkins v Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Jenkins v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 269
- Case
- [1999] FCA 269
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Repatriation Commission had correctly interpreted the relevant statutory provisions in assessing the applicant's disability and whether the decision-making process was flawed. The court had to examine the evidence presented, the application of the relevant legislation, and whether the Commission's decision was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the Repatriation Commission had correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions and that the decision-making process was sound. The court held that the evidence supported the Commission's findings, and there was no basis to interfere with the decision. Consequently, the application for judicial review was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application is dismissed.
2. No order as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.