[2019] FWC 6011

The attached document wholly replaces the document previously issued with the code [2019] FWCA 5113 on 28 August 2019 to correct document referencing.

Chambers of Deputy President Masson

29 August 2019

[2019] FWC 6011

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Japara Administration Pty Ltd
(AG2019/1383)

JAPARA ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD TASMANIAN NURSES AND AGED CARE EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 28 AUGUST 2019

Application for approval of the Japara Administration Pty Ltd Tasmanian Nurses and Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of the Japara Administration Pty Ltd Tasmanian Nurses and Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Japara Administration Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] A notice of employee representational rights (NERR) was provided to employees on 1 May 2018 1and the notice complied with the regulations.2 Employees were provided with access to the proposed Agreement and information about the effect of the terms of the Agreement along with a notice of the time and place and method of voting was provided to employees on 27 March 2019. Voting occurred in the period 4-10 April 2019 and a majority of those who voted approved the Agreement.3

[3] The Applicant filed a statutory declaration in support of the Agreement. The statutory declaration noted that the relevant awards for the purpose of the better off overall test (BOOT) were the Aged Care Award 2010 4(the Aged Care Award) and the Nurses Award 20105 (the Nurses Award).

[4] The statutory declaration noted that some of the provisions in the proposed Agreement were more beneficial than the awards or were not conferred by the awards. Some less beneficial terms were also identified.

[5] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, Tasmanian Branch (the ANMF) filed a statutory declaration on 21 May 2019, in which they supported approval and sought to be covered by the Agreement. In doing so, however, the ANMF identified a number of more and less beneficial terms in the Agreement that were not accurately identified in the Applicant’s Form F17 statutory declaration.

[6] The Health Services Union, Tasmanian Branch (HSU) also filed a statutory declaration on 14 May 2019, in which they advised that while seeking to be covered by the Agreement, they did not support its approval due to various NES and BOOT concerns.

[7] In reviewing the Agreement for approval, the Commission identified a number of concerns in relation to the pre-approvals of the Application process and the Agreement itself. These included National Employment Standards (NES) compliance and BOOT assessment considerations as follows;

(1) Pre-approval matters;

a. Question 2.5 of the Form F17 advised that the employees were emailed a copy of the Agreement, and copies were left in the staff room and reception. A copy of the email sent to employees…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Japara Administration Pty Ltd

Details

AGLC: Japara Administration Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 6011
Case: [2019] FWC 6011
Decision Date: 28 AUGUST 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Japara Administration Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Tasmanian Nurses and Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018. The applicant is an employer of nurses and aged care workers in Tasmania, and the dispute revolves around the terms and conditions of employment outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement. The Fair Work Commission is tasked with determining whether the agreement meets the legal standards set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including wages and other benefits, and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was free from any improper influence or coercion. Furthermore, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement covered all necessary matters and if it was consistent with the statutory safety net.

The Commission found that the proposed agreement met the necessary legal standards. It was determined that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including wages and other benefits, and complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was made in good faith, without any improper influence or coercion. The Commission also found that the agreement covered all necessary matters and was consistent with the statutory safety net. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the Tasmanian Nurses and Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Tasmanian Nurses and Aged Care Employees Enterprise Agreement 2018, effective from the date of the decision. The applicant is now bound by the terms and conditions outlined in the approved agreement, and the employees covered by the agreement are entitled to the benefits and protections provided within it.

Orders