James Hutchinson v Monash Health

Case

[2014] FWC 1489

3 MARCH 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 1489

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

James Hutchinson
v
Monash Health
(U2013/9060)

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 3 MARCH 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal - representation.

[1] This decision concerns applications by the Applicant and the Respondent for permission to be represented by a lawyer (counsel) pursuant to s.596 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[2] Section 596 of the FW Act provides for representation by lawyers as follows:

“Representation by lawyers and paid agents

    (1) Except as provided by subsection (3) or the procedural rules, a person may be represented in a matter before FWA (including by making an application or submission to FWA on behalf of the person) by a lawyer or paid agent only with the permission of FWA.

    (2) FWA may grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent in a matter before FWA only if:

      (a) it would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter; or

      (b) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented because the person is unable to represent himself, herself or itself effectively; or

      (c) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented taking into account fairness between the person and other persons in the same matter.”

[3] Having considered the submissions of both parties in this matter, I am satisfied that the matter is sufficiently complex that the representation of both the Applicant and the Respondent by a lawyer will enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently.

[4] I therefore grant permission for the Applicant and the Respondent to be represented by a lawyer pursuant to s.596(2)(a).

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR548288>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0