In the Matter of An Application by Mark Alfred Clarkson FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
[2022] HCASL 209
B49/2022
This application seeks leave to appeal from the judgment of Gordon J refusing the applicant's ex parte application for leave to issue or file an application for show cause orders. The decision of Gordon J is plainly correct. An appeal to this Court would have no prospects of success. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
J.J. Edelman J.S. Gleeson 8 December 2022
Continue reading In the Matter of An Application by Mark Alfred Clarkson For...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- In the Matter of An Application by Mark Alfred Clarkson For Leave To Appeal [2022] HCASL 209
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 209
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court, comprising J.J. Edelman and J.S. Gleeson, determined that the decision of Gordon J was correct and that an appeal to the High Court would have no prospects of success. The court found that the application for leave to appeal was not warranted, as the decision of Gordon J was sound and there was no reasonable basis for an appeal. The court also considered that it was not in the interests of justice to grant leave to appeal, as it would not result in any significant change or improvement to the outcome of the case.
The court's reasoning was based on the merits of the case and the grounds upon which the application for leave to appeal was made. The court concluded that the applicant's arguments did not provide a strong enough basis for an appeal and that the decision of Gordon J was correct. As a result, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed. The court further directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
The final orders of the court were to dismiss the application for leave to appeal and direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision of Gordon J was upheld, and the applicant's attempt to appeal the decision was unsuccessful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.