Hurst v Star City Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2009] NSWADT 65
•26 March 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hurst v Star City Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 65
[2009] NSWADT 65
26 March 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Hurst brought an action against Star City Pty Ltd for dismissal. Hurst alleged that they were dismissed because of their transgender identity. The matter was before the court on an application to dismiss the complaint. The court was required to decide whether the complaint should be dismissed and whether leave should be granted to amend the complaint. The court found that the complaint did not disclose a cause of action for unfair dismissal. However, the court found that the definition of transgender in the complaint was not sufficiently precise to allow the court to assess the merits of the case. The court found that the proposed amendment was not necessary to give the defendant a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations. The application to dismiss the complaint was refused and leave to amend the complaint was refused. The matter was listed for a case conference on 13 May 2009 at noon.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Appeal
-
Standing
-
Amendment of Pleadings
-
Sex Discrimination
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Perera v Director-General, Department of Education and Communities (Office of Communities) [2012] NSWADT 108
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Hurst v Star City Pty Ltd (EOD)
[2010] NSWADTAP 81
Star City Pty Ltd v Hurst (EOD)
[2009] NSWADTAP 35
Alabadla v State of NSW (NSW Police Force)
[2012] NSWADT 205
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
3
Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service v Orr
[2001] NSWADTAP 16
Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd
[1999] NSWADT 73
Karekar v TAFE Commission of New South Wales
[2000] NSWADT 187